Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35031206›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation2022

Cytomegalovirus prevention in thoracic organ transplantation: A single-center evaluation of letermovir prophylaxis.

Jennifer L Saullo, Arthur W Baker, Laurie D Snyder, John M Reynolds, Lorenzo Zaffiri, Emily M Eichenberger, Alana Ferrari, Julie M Steinbrink, Eileen K Maziarz, Melissa Bacchus and 3 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07079735 (VALganciclovir vs. LETermovir for Primary Prevention of CMV in Moderate to High-Risk Heart Transplant Recipients), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07079735 phase2 / phase3recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

VALganciclovir vs. LETermovir for Primary Prevention of CMV in Moderate to High-Risk Heart Transplant Recipients (The VALET-CMV Study)

TypeinterventionalSponsorColumbia UniversityRan2025 to 2029Enrolled150ConditionsCMV Viremia, Heart Transplant Infection, Heart Transplant Failure and RejectionArmsLetermovir, Valganciclovir
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Jennifer L SaulloDivision of Infectious Diseases, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina. Electronic address: jennifer.horan@duke.edu.
Arthur W BakerDivision of Infectious Diseases, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina; Duke Center for Antimicrobial Stewardship and Infection Prevention, Durham, North Carolina.
Laurie D SnyderDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
John M ReynoldsDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Lorenzo ZaffiriDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Emily M EichenbergerDivision of Infectious Diseases, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Alana FerrariDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, Virginia.
Julie M SteinbrinkDivision of Infectious Diseases, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Eileen K MaziarzDivision of Infectious Diseases, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Melissa BacchusDivision of Infectious Diseases, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Holly BerryDepartment of Pharmacy, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Stylianos A KakoullisDivision of Pulmonary and Intensive Care Medicine, European University of Cyprus School of Medicine, Engomi, Nicosia Cyprus.
Cameron R WolfeDivision of Infectious Diseases, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.

Funding

Transplant Infectious Diseases Interdisciplinary Research Training Grant (TIDIRTGT32AI100851 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI ALEXANDER, BARBARA D · 2013 to 2022
$1.8M
Combined Use of Statistical Process Control and Whole Genome Sequencing to Detect and Investigate Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Clusters and OutbreaksK08AI163462 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI BAKER, ARTHUR W · 2021 to 2025
$942k
NIAID NIH HHS K08 AI163462NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI100851
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is common following thoracic organ transplantation and causes substantial morbidity and mortality. Letermovir is a novel antiviral agent used off-label in this population for CMV prevention. Our goal was to understand patterns of letermovir use and effectiveness when applied for CMV prophylaxis after thoracic transplantation.

methodsWe retrospectively evaluated letermovir use among thoracic transplant recipients at an academic transplant center who initiated letermovir from January 2018 to October2019 for CMV prophylaxis. We analyzed indication, timing, and duration of prophylaxis; tolerability; and occurrence of breakthrough CMV DNAemia and disease.

resultsForty-two episodes of letermovir prophylaxis occurred in 41 patients, including 37 lung and 4 heart transplant recipients. Primary prophylaxis (26/42, 61.9%) was utilized mainly due to myelosuppression (25/26, 96.2%) and was initiated a median of 315 days post-transplant (interquartile range [IQR] 125-1139 days). Sixteen episodes of secondary prophylaxis (16/42, 38.1%) were initiated a median of 695 days post-transplant (IQR 537-1156 days) due to myelosuppression (10/16, 62.5%) or prior CMV resistance (6/16, 37.5%). Median duration of letermovir prophylaxis was 282 days (IQR 131-433 days). Adverse effects required letermovir cessation in 5/42 (11.9%) episodes. Only one episode (2.4%) was complicated by clinically significant breakthrough CMV infection. Transient low-level CMV DNAemia (<450 IU/ml) occurred in 15 episodes (35.7%) but did not require letermovir cessation.

conclusionsLetermovir was well tolerated and effective during extended prophylactic courses with only one case of breakthrough CMV infection in this cohort of thoracic transplant recipients. Further prospective trials of letermovir prophylaxis in this population are warranted.

Indexed as

Cytomegalovirus InfectionsHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationOrgan TransplantationAcetatesAntiviral AgentsCytomegalovirusHumansQuinazolinesRetrospective StudiesTransplant RecipientsAcetatesAntiviral AgentsletermovirQuinazolinescytomegalovirusheart transplantationletermovirlung transplantationprophylaxis

Identifiers

PMID35031206
PMCPMC9121640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.