Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35031075›Full record

ReviewMolecular cancer2022

Cancer exosomes and natural killer cells dysfunction: biological roles, clinical significance and implications for immunotherapy.

Reza Hosseini, Hamzeh Sarvnaz, Maedeh Arabpour, Samira Molaei Ramshe, Leila Asef-Kabiri, Hassan Yousefi, Mohammad Esmaeil Akbari, Nahid Eskandari

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 107 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. The Immune Microenvironment in Liver Cancer: From Analysis to Targeting.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Reza HosseiniDepartment of Immunology School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran. reza.hosseini6970@yahoo.com.
Hamzeh Sarvnaz *Department of Immunology School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Maedeh Arabpour *Department of Medical Genetics School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Samira Molaei Ramshe *Student Research Committee, Department of Medical Genetics, School of Medicine Shahid, Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Leila Asef-KabiriSurgical Oncologist Cancer Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. dr_leili_asef@yahoo.com.
Hassan YousefiDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, LSUHSC School of Medicine, New Orleans, USA.
Mohammad Esmaeil AkbariSurgical Oncologist Cancer Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Nahid EskandariDepartment of Immunology School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences · IRIsfahan University of Medical Sciences · IRTehran University of Medical Sciences · IRLouisiana State University Health Sciences Center New Orleans · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tumor-derived exosomes (TDEs) play pivotal roles in several aspects of cancer biology. It is now evident that TDEs also favor tumor growth by negatively affecting anti-tumor immunity. As important sentinels of immune surveillance system, natural killer (NK) cells can recognize malignant cells very early and counteract the tumor development and metastasis without a need for additional activation. Based on this rationale, adoptive transfer of ex vivo expanded NK cells/NK cell lines, such as NK-92 cells, has attracted great attention and is widely studied as a promising immunotherapy for cancer treatment. However, by exploiting various strategies, including secretion of exosomes, cancer cells are able to subvert NK cell responses. This paper reviews the roles of TDEs in cancer-induced NK cells impairments with mechanistic insights. The clinical significance and potential approaches to nullify the effects of TDEs on NK cells in cancer immunotherapy are also discussed.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiological TransportBiomarkersCell CommunicationCell SurvivalCytokinesCytotoxicity, ImmunologicDisease ManagementDisease SusceptibilityEnergy MetabolismExosomesGene Expression RegulationHumansImmunotherapyKiller Cells, NaturalNeoplasmsBiomarkersCytokinesNK Cell Lectin-Like Receptor Subfamily K

Identifiers

PMID35031075
PMCPMC8759167
OpenAlexW4206379781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.