ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2022
Understanding the ecosystem of patients with lysosomal storage diseases in Spain: a qualitative research with patients and health care professionals.
Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Health service access and delivery for people living with rare disorders: a scoping review.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2026Article
- Conceptualising the Patient Ecosystem: A Holistic Framework for Home Care.Scandinavian journal of caring sciences · 2026Article
- Lived Experiences of Patients With Rare Diseases and Healthcare System Barriers: A Phenomenological Study.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
- Human, economic, and social impact of lysosomal storage diseases.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2025Article
- Diagnostic networks for IEM in Brazil: report on 10 years of activity of the LSD Brazil Network, helping Brazil and Latin America to identify patients with lysosomal storage diseases.Journal of community genetics · 2025Article
- Criteria to evaluate unmet health-related needs of persons living with rare diseases and their caregivers: rapid literature review and stakeholder consultations.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2025Review
- Experiences of mothers of long-term surviving patients with cerebral adrenoleukodystrophy: a qualitative study.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2024Article
- Patient journey in cystinosis: focus on non-adherence and disease management.Drugs in context · 2024Article
- Literature Review on Health Emigration in Rare Diseases-A Machine Learning Perspective.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLysosomal Storage Diseases (LSDs) are a group of Rare Diseases (RDs) caused by lysosomal enzyme deficiencies. Patients with LSDs suffer from a wide range of symptoms with a strong impact in their daily routines. In this study we aimed to explore the impact of the disease on the lives of patients with four LSDs, as well as how they experience Patient Journey from diagnosis to follow up. Unmet Needs (UNs) perceived by patients and clinicians were assessed to have a better understanding of which initiatives could improve LSDs management and especially those that could result in an improvement of patients' quality of life.
methodsQualitative research was the research methodology selected for the study. It provides plentiful and holistic insights into people's views and actions. The study was conducted through in-depth face-to-face semi-structured interviews.
resultsIn total, 20 patients and 25 Health Care Professionals (HCPs) from different Spanish regions were interviewed. Patients perceived that the highest impact of the LSDs was on their daily routines, specifically on their emotional side, their work/school environment, their family and their social life. Regarding the Patient Journey experience, the worst perceived stage was the pre-diagnosis, where patients only reported negative perceptions, being the delay in diagnosis and misdiagnosis the most commented issues. On the contrary, the follow-up stage was the one with less negative perceptions. Overall, patients and HCPs agreed on the priority UNs, such as accelerating diagnosis, reducing bureaucracy for the treatment access and a more coordinated attention for the patients, not only among different physicians but also with other professionals such as genetic counselors or social workers.
conclusionsOur data shows that there are still UNs to be addressed from the perspective of patients and HCPs. The main UN is accelerating diagnosis, which could be achieved by medical awareness and education, according to clinicians. A more comprehensive disease management was another main point to be worked on to improve LSD-patient experience and quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.