Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35031050›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2022

Stress-induced hyperphagia: empirical characterization of stress-overeaters.

Birgit Kaiser, Kathrin Gemesi, Sophie Laura Holzmann, Monika Wintergerst, Martin Lurz, Hans Hauner, Georg Groh, Markus Böhm, Helmut Krcmar, Christina Holzapfel and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Birgit KaiserResearch Group Public Health Nutrition, ZIEL - Institute for Food & Health, Technical University of Munich, Weihenstephaner Berg 1, 85354, Freising, Germany.
Kathrin GemesiInstitute for Nutritional Medicine, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Sophie Laura HolzmannInstitute for Nutritional Medicine, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Monika WintergerstResearch Group Social Computing, Department of Informatics, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany.
Martin LurzKrcmar Lab, Department of Informatics, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany.
Hans HaunerInstitute for Nutritional Medicine, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Georg GrohResearch Group Social Computing, Department of Informatics, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany.
Markus BöhmKrcmar Lab, Department of Informatics, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany.
Helmut KrcmarKrcmar Lab, Department of Informatics, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany.
Christina HolzapfelInstitute for Nutritional Medicine, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Kurt GedrichResearch Group Public Health Nutrition, ZIEL - Institute for Food & Health, Technical University of Munich, Weihenstephaner Berg 1, 85354, Freising, Germany. kgedrich@tum.de.
Technical University of Munich · DELeibniz-Institute for Food Systems Biology at the Technical University of Munich · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStressful situations can have an impact on an individual's eating behavior. People vulnerable to the influence of stress tend to change the quantity and quality of their food intake. Variables such as sex and body mass index (BMI) seem to be related to this stress-eating behavior, but it is rather unclear what factors account to the parameters associated with stress-eating behavior. The aim of this survey was to identify further characteristics of adults in Germany related to stress-overeating, focusing on stress perception, coping, eating motives and comfort foods as well as personality types.

methodsThis online survey was performed throughout Germany and comprised a 38-item pre-tested questionnaire. Stress-induced overeating was classified based on the Salzburg Stress Eating Scale (SSES). Moreover, validated questionnaires were used to identify additional characteristics of stress eaters. Participants were recruited using a convenience sampling approach, and data were collected between January and April 2021.

resultsThe overall sample consisted of 1222 participants (female 80.8%, aged 31.5±12.8). 42.1% of participants were identified as stress-overeaters. Among the remaining group, 78.9% stated to eat less, 21.1% to eat equally when stressed. Female participants had a higher mean SSES score compared to male participants. The BMI was positively correlated to SSES, r(1220)=0.28, p>0.005. 'Agreeableness' (BigFive) was found to be a negative predictor of stress-overeating. The most pronounced difference in eating motives (The Eating Motivation Survey, TEMS) was found for 'Affect Regulation' and 'Weight Control'.

conclusionsThe results indicate that stress-overeating affects a large proportion of the surveyed population. BMI, personality and eating motives additionally characterize stress-overeaters and may contribute to develop new approaches to address unhealthy stress-related eating patterns.

Indexed as

Feeding BehaviorHyperphagiaAdultBody Mass IndexFemaleHumansMaleMotivationSurveys and QuestionnairesCopingEating motivesNutritionOvereatingPersonalityStress

Identifiers

PMID35031050
PMCPMC8760707
OpenAlexW4206207286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.