Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35031022›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2022

"Even though they insult us, the delivery they give us is the greatest thing": a qualitative study contextualizing women's experiences with facility-based maternal health care in Ethiopia.

Ashley Hagaman, Humberto Gonzalez Rodriguez, Clare Barrington, Kavita Singh, Abiy Seifu Estifanos, Dorka Woldesenbet Keraga, Abiyou Kiflie Alemayehu, Mehiret Abate, Befikadu Bitewulign, Pierre Barker and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Ashley HagamanDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Yale School of Public Health, Yale University, 60 College St, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA. Ashley.hagaman@yale.edu.
Humberto Gonzalez RodriguezDepartment of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 135 Dauer Dr, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
Clare BarringtonDepartment of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 135 Dauer Dr, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
Kavita SinghCarolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 123 W. Franklin St, Chapel Hill, NC, 27516, USA.
Abiy Seifu EstifanosDepartment of Reproductive, Family and Population Health, School of Public Health, Addis Ababa University, Zambia Street, Tikur Anbessa Hospital Building, Lideta Sub-city, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Dorka Woldesenbet KeragaDepartment of Reproductive, Family and Population Health, School of Public Health, Addis Ababa University, Zambia Street, Tikur Anbessa Hospital Building, Lideta Sub-city, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Abiyou Kiflie AlemayehuInstitute for Healthcare Improvement, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Mehiret AbateInstitute for Healthcare Improvement, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Befikadu BitewulignInstitute for Healthcare Improvement, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Pierre BarkerInstitute for Healthcare Improvement, Boston, MA, USA.
Hema MaggeDepartment of Reproductive, Family and Population Health, School of Public Health, Addis Ababa University, Zambia Street, Tikur Anbessa Hospital Building, Lideta Sub-city, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USAddis Ababa University · ETBill & Melinda Gates Foundation · USInstitute for Healthcare Improvement · USTikur Anbessa Hospital · ETYale University · US

Funding

POPULATION STUDIEST32HD007168 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ELIZABETH A FRANKENBERG · 1985 to 2026
$13.8M
Research Services CoreP2CHD050924 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI KAREN B GUZZO · 2015 to 2026
$9.6M
NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD050924NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD007168
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlobally, amidst increased utilization of facility-based maternal care services, there is continued need to better understand women's experience of care in places of birth. Quantitative surveys may not sufficiently characterize satisfaction with maternal healthcare (MHC) in local context, limiting their interpretation and applicability. The purpose of this study is to untangle how contextual and cultural expectations shape women's care experience and what women mean by satisfaction in two Ethiopian regions.

methodsHealth center and hospital childbirth care registries were used to identify and interview 41 women who had delivered a live newborn within a six-month period. We used a semi-structured interview guide informed by the Donabedian framework to elicit women's experiences with MHC and delivery, any prior delivery experiences, and recommendations to improve MHC. We used an inductive analytical approach to compare and contrast MHC processes, experiences, and satisfaction.

resultsMaternal and newborn survival and safety were central to women's descriptions of their MHC experiences. Women nearly exclusively described healthy and safe deliveries with healthy outcomes as 'satisfactory'. The texture behind this 'satisfaction', however, was shaped by what mothers bring to their delivery experiences, creating expectations from events including past births, experiences with antenatal care, and social and community influences. Secondary to the absence of adverse outcomes, health provider's interpersonal behaviors (e.g., supportive communication and behavioral demonstrations of commitment to their births) and the facility's amenities (e.g., bathing, cleaning, water, coffee, etc) enhanced women's experiences. Finally, at the social and community levels, we found that family support and material resources may significantly buffer against negative experiences and facilitate women's overall satisfaction, even in the context of poor-quality facilities and limited resources.

conclusionOur findings highlight the importance of understanding contextual factors including past experiences, expectations, and social support that influence perceived quality of MHC and the agency a woman has to negotiate her care experience. Our finding that newborn and maternal survival primarily drove women's satisfaction suggests that quantitative assessments conducted shortly following delivery may be overly influenced by these outcomes and not fully capture the complexity of women's care experience.

Indexed as

Patient SatisfactionQuality of Health CareAdultDelivery, ObstetricEthiopiaFemaleHealth FacilitiesHumansMaternal Health ServicesMothersOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CareQualitative ResearchChildbirthEthiopiaHealthcare satisfactionHealthcare servicesMaternal healthQualitative

Identifiers

PMID35031022
PMCPMC8759250
OpenAlexW4206527842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.