Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35030968›Full record

ReviewBioengineered2022

Recent advances of natural biopolymeric culture scaffold: synthesis and modification.

Jia Xin Yap, C P Leo, Nazlina Haiza Mohd Yasin, Pau Loke Show, Dinh-Toi Chu, Vijai Singh, C J C Derek

Abstract readReviewVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Review in Bioengineered, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jia Xin YapSchool of Chemical Engineering, Engineering Campus, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Nibong Tebal, Malaysia.
C P LeoSchool of Chemical Engineering, Engineering Campus, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Nibong Tebal, Malaysia.
Nazlina Haiza Mohd YasinDepartment of Biological Sciences and Biotechnology, Faculty of Science and Technology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Malaysia.
Pau Loke ShowDepartment of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Nottingham Malaysia, Semenyih, Malaysia.
Dinh-Toi ChuCenter for Biomedicine and Community Health, International School, Vietnam National University, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Vijai SinghDepartment of Biosciences, School of Science, Indrashil University, Rajpur, Mehsana, India.
C J C DerekSchool of Chemical Engineering, Engineering Campus, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Nibong Tebal, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-1046-0364

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditionally existing 2D culture scaffold has been inappropriately validated due to the failure in generating the precise therapeutic response. Therefore, this leads to the fabrication of 3D culture scaffold resolving the limitations in the

Indexed as

Tissue EngineeringAnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsHumansTissue ScaffoldsBiocompatible MaterialsagaroseBiopolymercell culturecellulosicchitosancollagenculture scaffoldgelatinsilk fibroin

Identifiers

PMID35030968
PMCPMC8974151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.