Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35030227›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

An analysis of the HIV testing cascade of a group of HIV-exposed infants from birth to 18 months in peri-urban Khayelitsha, South Africa.

Aurelie Kennedy Nelson, Tali Cassidy, Laura Trivino Duran, Vivian Cox, Catherine J Wedderburn, Janet Giddy, Pauline Pieters, Mark F Cotton, Tabitha Mutseyekwa, Bulelwa Rorwana and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Aurelie Kennedy NelsonMédecins Sans Frontières, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-8681-7377
Tali CassidyMédecins Sans Frontières, Cape Town, South Africa.
Laura Trivino DuranMédecins Sans Frontières, Cape Town, South Africa.
Vivian CoxDesmond Tutu TB Centre, Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.
Catherine J WedderburnDepartment of Paediatrics and Child Health, Red Cross War Memorial Children's Hospital, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Janet GiddyKhayelitsha & Eastern Sub-Structure, Western Cape Provincial Department of Health, Cape Town, South Africa.
Pauline PietersKhayelitsha & Eastern Sub-Structure, Western Cape Provincial Department of Health, Cape Town, South Africa.
Mark F CottonFamily Center for Research with Ubuntu, Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Stellenbosch University, Tygerberg Children's Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-2559-6034
Tabitha MutseyekwaMédecins Sans Frontières, Cape Town, South Africa.
Bulelwa RorwanaMédecins Sans Frontières, Cape Town, South Africa.
Beryl SibandaMédecins Sans Frontières, Cape Town, South Africa.
Jonathan BernheimerMédecins Sans Frontières, Cape Town, South Africa.
Nopinky MatiseMédecins Sans Frontières, Cape Town, South Africa.
Petros IsaakidisSouthern African Medical Unit, Cape Town, South Africa.
Jean MaritzDivision of Medical Virology, Department of Pathology, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.
Médecins Sans Frontières · ZAStellenbosch University · ZAUniversity of Cape Town · ZAWestern Cape Department of Health · ZADesmond Tutu HIV Foundation · ZAHealth & Medical Publishing Group · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the reduction of HIV mother-to-child transmission, there are concerns regarding transmission rate in the breastfeeding period. We describe the routine uptake of 6 or 10 (6/10) weeks, 9 months and 18 months testing, with and without tracing, in a cohort of infants who received HIV PCR testing at birth (birth PCR) (with and without point of care (POC) testing) in a peri-urban primary health care setting in Khayelitsha, South Africa.

methodsIn this cohort study conducted between November 2014 and February 2018, HIV-positive mothers and their HIV-exposed babies were recruited at birth and all babies were tested with birth PCR. Results of routine 6/10 weeks PCR, 9 months and 18 months testing were followed up by a patient tracer. We compared testing at 6/10 weeks with a subgroup from historical cohort who was not tested with birth PCR.

resultsWe found that the uptake of 6/10 weeks testing was 77%, compared to 82% with tracing. When including all infants in the cascade and comparing to a historical cohort without birth testing, we found that infants who tested a birth were 22% more likely to have a 6/10 weeks test compared to those not tested at birth. There was no significant difference between the uptake of 6/10 weeks testing after birth PCR POC versus birth PCR testing without POC. Uptake of 9 months and 18 months testing was 39% and 24% respectively. With intense tracing efforts, uptake increased to 45% and 34% respectively.

conclusionUptake of HIV testing for HIV-exposed uninfected infants in the first 18 months of life shows good completion of the 6/10 weeks PCR but suboptimal uptake of HIV testing at 9 months and 18 months, despite tracing efforts. Birth PCR testing did not negatively affect uptake of the 6/10 weeks HIV test compared to no birth PCR testing.

Indexed as

Anti-HIV AgentsBreast FeedingCohort StudiesFemaleHIVHIV InfectionsHIV TestingHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInfectious Disease Transmission, VerticalMaleMothersPoint-of-Care TestingPolymerase Chain ReactionPregnancyAnti-HIV Agents

Identifiers

PMID35030227
PMCPMC8759686
OpenAlexW4205343495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.