Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35030225›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Insights into cell wall disintegration of Chlorella vulgaris.

Sophie Weber, Philipp M Grande, Lars M Blank, Holger Klose

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 124 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Surface-dependent reorganization ofCell surface (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Toxicological Responses of Photosynthetic Genes inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Oral Exposure toToxins · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sophie WeberInstitute for Bio- and Geosciences, Plantsciences-IBG-2, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, Germany.
Philipp M GrandeInstitute for Bio- and Geosciences, Plantsciences-IBG-2, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, Germany.
Lars M BlankInstitute of Applied Microbiology, Aachen Biology and Biotechnology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Holger KloseInstitute for Bio- and Geosciences, Plantsciences-IBG-2, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3804-0094
Forschungszentrum Jülich · DERWTH Aachen University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With their ability of CO2 fixation using sunlight as an energy source, algae and especially microalgae are moving into the focus for the production of proteins and other valuable compounds. However, the valorization of algal biomass depends on the effective disruption of the recalcitrant microalgal cell wall. Especially cell walls of Chlorella species proved to be very robust. The wall structures that are responsible for this robustness have been studied less so far. Here, we evaluate different common methods to break up the algal cell wall effectively and measure the success by protein and carbohydrate release. Subsequently, we investigate algal cell wall features playing a role in the wall's recalcitrance towards disruption. Using different mechanical and chemical technologies, alkali catalyzed hydrolysis of the Chlorella vulgaris cells proved to be especially effective in solubilizing up to 56 wt% protein and 14 wt% carbohydrates of the total biomass. The stepwise degradation of C. vulgaris cell walls using a series of chemicals with increasingly strong conditions revealed that each fraction released different ratios of proteins and carbohydrates. A detailed analysis of the monosaccharide composition of the cell wall extracted in each step identified possible factors for the robustness of the cell wall. In particular, the presence of chitin or chitin-like polymers was indicated by glucosamine found in strong alkali extracts. The presence of highly ordered starch or cellulose was indicated by glucose detected in strong acidic extracts. Our results might help to tailor more specific efforts to disrupt Chlorella cell walls and help to valorize microalgae biomass.

Indexed as

BiomassCarbohydratesCelluloseCell WallChlorella vulgarisMicroalgaeStarchCarbohydratesCelluloseStarch

Identifiers

PMID35030225
PMCPMC8759652
OpenAlexW4205907959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.