Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35029874›Full record

ArticleMedicine2022

Different acupotomy for stenosing tenosynovitis: A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Lingzhi Wei, Qi Tong, Yue Liu, Xinju Hou, Fang Zhi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 52% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lingzhi WeiNanchang Hongdu Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jiangxi Province, China.
Qi TongJiangxi Health Vocational College, Jiangxi Province, China.
Yue LiuJiangxi Health Vocational College, Jiangxi Province, China.
Xinju HouNanchang Hongdu Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jiangxi Province, China.
Fang ZhiNanchang Hongdu Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jiangxi Province, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1765-2585
Anyang Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNJiangxi Applied Engineering Vocational Institute · CN

Funding

Key Research and Development Program of Jiangxi Province (No.S2020ZPYFB0866)National Famous Traditional Chinese Medicine Expert Inheritance Studio Construction Project [2016] No. 42
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStenosing tenosynovitis (STS) is a chronic aseptic inflammation caused by mechanical friction. The main clinical manifestations are local pain and limited activity of the affected parts, which reduce people's quality of life. The clinical effect of acupotomy in the treatment of STS is significant, and the operation is simple and the side effect is small. But there are many kinds of acupotomology, and there is a lack of comparative study between different Acupotomology. In this study, the effectiveness of 4 commonly used needle knife therapies (v-knife, oblique knife, crochet knife, flat knife) was ranked by the method of network meta.

methodsCNKI, Wanfang, VIP, Sinomed, PubMed, and Cochrane Library were searched to collect randomized controlled trials of v-knife, oblique knife, crochet knife, and flat knife in the treatment of STS. The search time limit is from the date of establishment to October 15, 2021. Revman5.3, gemtc 0.14.3, and stata14.2 were used for data analysis, and Cochrane bias risk assessment tool was used to screen and evaluate the quality of included literatures.

conclusionObjective to provide evidence-based medicine evidence for clinical selection of the best needle knife treatment scheme for STS.

Indexed as

Acupuncture TherapyHumansNetwork Meta-Analysis as TopicQuality of LifeResearch DesignSystematic Reviews as TopicTendon Entrapment

Identifiers

PMID35029874
PMCPMC8735810
OpenAlexW4206068973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.