Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35029818›Full record

ReviewAnnals of nuclear medicine2022

A review on AI in PET imaging.

Keisuke Matsubara, Masanobu Ibaraki, Mitsutaka Nemoto, Hiroshi Watabe, Yuichi Kimura

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of nuclear medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Arrival time mapping withEJNMMI research · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Deep transformer-based personalized dosimetry from SPECT/CT images: a hybrid approach for [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Applications of artificial intelligence in dementia.Geriatrics & gerontology international · 2024
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Keisuke MatsubaraDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Research Institute for Brain and Blood Vessels, Akita Cerebrospinal and Cardiovascular Center, Akita, Japan.
Masanobu IbarakiDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Research Institute for Brain and Blood Vessels, Akita Cerebrospinal and Cardiovascular Center, Akita, Japan.
Mitsutaka NemotoFaculty of Biology-Oriented Science and Technology, and Cyber Informatics Research Institute, Kindai University, Wakayama, Japan.
Hiroshi WatabeCyclotron and Radioisotope Center (CYRIC), Tohoku University, Miyagi, Japan.
Yuichi KimuraFaculty of Biology-Oriented Science and Technology, and Cyber Informatics Research Institute, Kindai University, Wakayama, Japan. ukimura@ieee.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4865-6474

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) has been applied to various medical imaging tasks, such as computer-aided diagnosis. Specifically, deep learning techniques such as convolutional neural network (CNN) and generative adversarial network (GAN) have been extensively used for medical image generation. Image generation with deep learning has been investigated in studies using positron emission tomography (PET). This article reviews studies that applied deep learning techniques for image generation on PET. We categorized the studies for PET image generation with deep learning into three themes as follows: (1) recovering full PET data from noisy data by denoising with deep learning, (2) PET image reconstruction and attenuation correction with deep learning and (3) PET image translation and synthesis with deep learning. We introduce recent studies based on these three categories. Finally, we mention the limitations of applying deep learning techniques to PET image generation and future prospects for PET image generation.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligencePositron-Emission TomographyDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedNeural Networks, ComputerArtificial intelligenceDeep learningPET

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.