ArticleAnnals of nuclear medicine2022
New standards for phantom image quality and SUV harmonization range for multicenter oncology PET studies.
Article in Annals of nuclear medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Robustness of FDG-PET/CT Quantitative Metrics Post-Harmonization in a Multicenter, Cross-Scanner Setting.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2026Article
- Harmonisation of standard uptake values in long-axial field-of-view PET/CT: an exploratory study.EJNMMI physics · 2026Article
- Investigation of optimal settings for deviceless respiratory synchronization in PET/CT examinations: effects of different reconstructions on image quality.Radiological physics and technology · 2025Article
- Evaluation of a digital bismuth germanium oxide PET/CT system according to the Japanese brain tumor phantom test forPhysical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2025Article
- Comparative evaluation of quantitative analysis using two phantom-based software programs forRadiological physics and technology · 2025Article
- Innovations in clinical PET image reconstruction: advances in Bayesian penalized likelihood algorithm and deep learning.Annals of nuclear medicine · 2025Review
- Predictive value ofAnnals of nuclear medicine · 2025Article
- Effects of a deep learning-based image quality enhancement method on a digital-BGO PET/CT system forEJNMMI physics · 2025Article
- Phantom test procedures for a new neuro-oncological amino acid PET tracer: [Annals of nuclear medicine · 2025Article
- Comparative evaluation of Ordered Subset Expectation Maximization and Bayesian Penalized Likelihood algorithms for PET/CT image reconstruction in various malignancies usingFrontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Harmonization of brain PET images in multi-center PET studies using Hoffman phantom scan.EJNMMI physics · 2023Article
- Impact of list-mode reconstruction and image-space point spread function correction on PET image contrast and quantitative value using SiPM-based PET/CT system.Radiological physics and technology · 2023Article
- A review of harmonization strategies for quantitative PET.Annals of nuclear medicine · 2023Review
- Image quality assessment along the one metre axial field-of-view of the total-body Biograph Vision Quadra PET/CT system forEJNMMI physics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Not only visual interpretation for lesion detection, staging, and characterization, but also quantitative treatment response assessment are key roles for
Indexed as
Identifiers
35029817What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.