Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35029755›Full record

ReviewZeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie2022

Comparison of delirium detection tools in acute care : A rapid review.

Simone Brefka, Gerhard Wilhelm Eschweiler, Dhayana Dallmeier, Michael Denkinger, Christoph Leinert

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. [Delirium superimposed on dementia : Early detection and treatment].Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Simone BrefkaInstitute for Geriatric Research, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany. simone.brefka@agaplesion.de.
Gerhard Wilhelm EschweilerGeriatric Center, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Dhayana DallmeierGeriatric Center Ulm/Alb Donau, Ulm, Germany.
Michael DenkingerInstitute for Geriatric Research, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Christoph LeinertInstitute for Geriatric Research, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDelirium is a frequent psychopathological syndrome in geriatric patients. It is sometimes the only symptom of acute illness and bears a high risk for complications. Therefore, feasible assessments are needed for delirium detection. OBJECTIVE AND

methodsRapid review of available delirium assessments based on a current Medline search and cross-reference check with a special focus on those implemented in acute care hospital settings.

resultsA total of 75 delirium detection tools were identified. Many focused on inattention as well as acute onset and/or fluctuating course of cognitive changes as key features for delirium. A range of assessments are based on the confusion assessment method (CAM) that has been adapted for various clinical settings. The need for a collateral history, time resources and staff training are major challenges in delirium assessment. Latest tests address these through a two-step approach, such as the ultrabrief (UB) CAM or by optional assessment of temporal aspects of cognitive changes (4 As test, 4AT). Most delirium screening assessments are validated for patient interviews, some are suitable for monitoring delirium symptoms over time or diagnosing delirium based on collateral history only.

conclusionBesides the CAM the 4AT has become well-established in acute care because of its good psychometric properties and practicability. There are several other instruments extending and improving the possibilities of delirium detection in different clinical settings.

Indexed as

DeliriumAgedCognitionCritical CareHumansMass ScreeningSensitivity and Specificity4As testAssessmentConfusion assessment methodPracticabilityScreening

Identifiers

PMID35029755
PMCPMC8921069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.