Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35029318›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical virology2022

Angiotensin II infusion in COVID-19: An international, multicenter, registry-based study.

Ary Serpa Neto, Giovanni Landoni, Marlies Ostermann, Nuttha Lumlertgul, Lui Forni, Lucas Alvarez-Belon, Tony Trapani, Patricia V Alliegro, Kai Zacharowski, Carolin Wiedenbeck and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical virology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Angiotensin II - A Brief Review and Role in Severe SARS-COV-2 Sepsis.Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 6 countries.

Ary Serpa NetoAustralian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1520-9387
Giovanni LandoniDepartment of Intensive Care and Anesthesiology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Marlies OstermannDepartment of Critical Care, Guys & St Thomas' Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Nuttha LumlertgulDepartment of Critical Care, Guys & St Thomas' Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Lui ForniDepartment of Intensive Care, Royal Surrey County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Surrey, UK.
Lucas Alvarez-BelonDepartment of Intensive Care, Royal Surrey County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Surrey, UK.
Tony TrapaniAustralian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Patricia V AlliegroAustralian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Kai ZacharowskiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine & Pain Therapy, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany.
Carolin WiedenbeckDepartment of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine & Pain Therapy, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany.
Daniel de BackerIntensive Care Department, CHIREC Hospitals, Brussels and Braine l'Alleaud-Waterloo, Braine-l'Alleud, Belgium.
Rinaldo BellomoAustralian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society · AUGoethe University Frankfurt · DEGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust · GBRoyal Surrey County Hospital · GBCentre Hospitalier Interrégional Edith Cavell · BEThe Royal Melbourne Hospital · AUThe University of Melbourne · AUVita-Salute San Raffaele University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To expand our understanding of the role of angiotensin II (ANGII) in coronavirus infectious disease 2019 (COVID-19), we conducted an international, multicenter registry study to assess the use of ANGII in patients with COVID-19 compared to patients not receiving ANGII. Critically ill adult patients who were diagnosed with COVID-19 and received ANGII were matched with COVID-19 patients not receiving ANGII according to age, respiratory support, history of hypertension, use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and/or ANGII receptor blocker, and date of admission. All outcomes were exploratory in nature and included improvement in oxygenation, duration of organ support, and mortality. In one year, 132 patients were included (65 in the ANGII group and 67 in the control group), and patients were comparable in baseline characteristics. During the first 12 h of infusion, patients in the ANGII had a faster decrease in FiO

Indexed as

Communicable DiseasesCOVID-19 Drug TreatmentAdultAngiotensin IIHumansRegistriesSARS-CoV-2Angiotensin IIbiochemical analysiscoronavirusrespiratory tractSARS coronavirus

Identifiers

PMID35029318
PMCPMC9015246
OpenAlexW4206136066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.