Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35029058›Full record

ArticleBrain and behavior2022

Continuous and intermittent theta burst stimulation to the visual cortex do not alter GABA and glutamate concentrations measured by magnetic resonance spectroscopy.

Karlene S Stoby, Sara A Rafique, Georg Oeltzschner, Jennifer K E Steeves

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain and behavior, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Karlene S StobyCentre for Vision Research and Department of Psychology, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Sara A RafiqueCentre for Vision Research and Department of Psychology, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3636-4001
Georg OeltzschnerRussell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Jennifer K E SteevesCentre for Vision Research and Department of Psychology, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7487-4646
York University · CAKennedy Krieger Institute · US

Funding

Towards a comprehensive neurometabolic profile in patients with mild cognitive impairment.R00AG062230 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI OELTZSCHNER, GEORG · 2021 to 2023
$735k
NIA NIH HHS R00 AG062230
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTheta burst stimulation (TBS), a form of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), uses repeated high-frequency bursts to non-invasively modulate neural processes in the brain. An intermittent TBS (iTBS) protocol is generally considered "excitatory," while continuous TBS (cTBS) is considered "inhibitory." However, the majority of work that has led to these effects being associated with the respective protocols has been done in the motor cortex, and it is well established that TMS can have variable effects across the brain. OBJECTIVES AND

methodWe investigated the effects of iTBS and cTBS to the primary visual cortex (V1) on composite levels of gamma-aminobutyric acid + co-edited macromolecules (GABA+) and glutamate + glutamine (Glx) since these are key inhibitory and excitatory neurotransmitters, respectively. Participants received a single session of cTBS, iTBS, or sham TBS to V1. GABA+ and Glx were quantified in vivo at the stimulation site using spectral-edited proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (

resultsThere were no significant changes in GABA+ or Glx following either of the TBS conditions. Visual cortical excitability, measured using phosphene thresholds, remained unchanged following both cTBS and iTBS conditions. There was no relationship between excitability thresholds and GABA+ or Glx levels. However, TBS did alter the relationship between GABA+ and Glx for up to 1 h following stimulation.

conclusionsThese findings demonstrate that a single session of TBS to the visual cortex can be used without significant effects on the tonic levels of these key neurotransmitters; and add to our understanding that TBS has differential effects at visual, motor, and frontal cortices.

Indexed as

Glutamic AcidVisual CortexEvoked Potentials, Motorgamma-Aminobutyric AcidHumansMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyTranscranial Magnetic Stimulationgamma-Aminobutyric AcidGlutamic Acidgamma-aminobutyric acidglutamatemagnetic resonance spectroscopytheta burst stimulationtranscranial magnetic stimulationvisual cortex

Identifiers

PMID35029058
PMCPMC8865152
OpenAlexW4205092771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.