Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35028950›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2022

Transcranial magnetic stimulation as biomarker of excitability in drug development: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study.

Titia Q Ruijs, Jules A A C Heuberger, Annika A de Goede, Dimitrios Ziagkos, Marije E Otto, Robert J Doll, Michel J A M van Putten, Geert Jan Groeneveld

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Titia Q RuijsCentre for Human Drug Research, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8261-924X
Jules A A C HeubergerCentre for Human Drug Research, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7202-5088
Annika A de GoedeCentre for Human Drug Research, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1549-6753
Dimitrios ZiagkosCentre for Human Drug Research, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Marije E OttoCentre for Human Drug Research, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5767-604X
Robert J DollCentre for Human Drug Research, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7551-9072
Michel J A M van PuttenUniversity of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8319-3626
Geert Jan GroeneveldCentre for Human Drug Research, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4655-6667
Centre for Human Drug Research · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NLUniversity of Twente · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThe purpose of this study was to investigate pharmacodynamic effects of drugs targeting cortical excitability using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) combined with electromyography (EMG) and electroencephalography (EEG) in healthy subjects, to further develop TMS outcomes as biomarkers for proof-of-mechanism in early-phase clinical drug development. Antiepileptic drugs presumably modulate cortical excitability. Therefore, we studied effects of levetiracetam, valproic acid and lorazepam on cortical excitability in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, 4-way cross-over study.

methodsIn 16 healthy male subjects, single- and paired-pulse TMS-EMG-EEG measurements were performed predose and 1.5, 7 and 24 hours postdose. Treatment effects on motor-evoked potential, short and long intracortical inhibition and TMS-evoked potential amplitudes, were analysed using a mixed model ANCOVA and cluster-based permutation analysis.

resultsWe show that motor-evoked potential amplitudes decreased after administration of levetiracetam (estimated difference [ED] -378.4 μV; 95%CI: -644.3, -112.5 μV; P < .01), valproic acid (ED -268.8 μV; 95%CI: -532.9, -4.6 μV; P = .047) and lorazepam (ED -330.7 μV; 95%CI: -595.6, -65.8 μV; P = .02) when compared with placebo. Long intracortical inhibition was enhanced by levetiracetam (ED -60.3%; 95%CI: -87.1%, -33.5%; P < .001) and lorazepam (ED -68.2%; 95%CI: -94.7%, -41.7%; P < .001) at a 50-ms interstimulus interval. Levetiracetam increased TMS-evoked potential component N45 (P = .004) in a central cluster and decreased N100 (P < .001) in a contralateral cluster.

conclusionThis study shows that levetiracetam, valproic acid and lorazepam decrease cortical excitability, which can be detected using TMS-EMG-EEG in healthy subjects. These findings provide support for the use of TMS excitability measures as biomarkers to demonstrate pharmacodynamic effects of drugs that influence cortical excitability.

Indexed as

LorazepamTranscranial Magnetic StimulationBiomarkersCross-Over StudiesElectroencephalographyHumansLevetiracetamMalePharmaceutical PreparationsValproic AcidBiomarkersLevetiracetamLorazepamPharmaceutical PreparationsValproic Acidantiepileptic drugsbiomarkerscortical excitabilitylevetiracetamlorazepamTMS-EEGTMS-EMGtranscranial magnetic stimulationvalproic acid

Identifiers

PMID35028950
PMCPMC9303426
OpenAlexW4205514970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.