ArticleMedical physics2022
Knowledge-based quality control of organ delineations in radiation therapy.
Article in Medical physics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- An improved nnUNet with Axial Attention Mechanism and Attention Gated Units for Efficient and Accurate Kidney Segmentation in CT Images.Medical physics · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence (AI)-based multi-organ contour quality assurance with uncertainty estimation for online adaptive radiotherapy (oART).Machine Learning. Health · 2026Article
- The impact of neck tilt on the accuracy of deep learning generated contours for CT images of the head and neck.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025Article
- Performance analysis and knowledge-based quality assurance of critical organ auto-segmentation for pediatric craniospinal irradiation.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Knowledge-based quality assurance of a comprehensive set of organ at risk contours for head and neck radiotherapy.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Contouring quality assurance methodology based on multiple geometric features against deep learning auto-segmentation.Medical physics · 2023Article
- The future of MRI in radiation therapy: Challenges and opportunities for the MR community.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2022Review
- Scalable radiotherapy data curation infrastructure for deep-learning based autosegmentation of organs-at-risk: A case study in head and neck cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Auto-segmentation for total marrow irradiation.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Streamlining Thoracic Radiotherapy Quality assurance: One-Class Classification for Automated OAR Contour Assessment.Technology in cancer research & treatmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo reduce the likelihood of errors in organ delineations used for radiotherapy treatment planning, a knowledge-based quality control (KBQC) system, which discriminates between valid and anomalous delineations is developed. METHOD AND MATERIALS: The KBQC is comprised of a group-wise inference system and anomaly detection modules trained using historical priors from 296 locally advanced lung and prostate cancer patient computational tomographies (CTs). The inference system discriminates different organs based on shape, relational, and intensity features. For a given delineated image set, the inference system solves a combinatorial optimization problem that results in an organ group whose relational features follow those of the training set considering the posterior probabilities obtained from support vector machine (SVM), discriminant subspace ensemble (DSE), and artificial neural network (ANN) classifiers. These classifiers are trained on nonrelational features with a 10-fold cross-validation scheme. The anomaly detection module is a bank of ANN autoencoders, each corresponding with an organ, trained on nonrelational features. A heuristic rule detects anomalous organs that exceed predefined organ-specific tolerances for the feature reconstruction error and the classifier's posterior probabilities. Independent data sets with anomalous delineations were used to test the overall performance of the KBQC system. The anomalous delineations were manually manipulated, computer-generated, or propagated based on a transformation obtained by imperfect registrations. Both peer-review-based scoring system and shape similarity coefficient (DSC) were used to label regions of interest (ROIs) as normal or anomalous in two independent test cohorts.
resultsThe accuracy of the classifiers was
conclusionThe KBQC system detected anomalous delineations with superior accuracy compared to classification methods that judge only based on posterior probabilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.