Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35028948›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2022

Knowledge-based quality control of organ delineations in radiation therapy.

Hamidreza Nourzadeh, Cheukkai Hui, Mahmoud Ahmad, Nasrin Sadeghzadehyazdi, William T Watkins, Sunil W Dutta, Clayton E Alonso, Daniel M Trifiletti, Jeffrey V Siebers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Hamidreza NourzadehSidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Cheukkai HuiArizona Oncology, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
Mahmoud AhmadVanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Nasrin SadeghzadehyazdiElectrical Engineering Department, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
William T WatkinsCity of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California, USA.
Sunil W DuttaRadiation Oncology Department, Emory University, Georgia, USA.
Clayton E AlonsoOAK Hill Hospital, Brooksville, Florida, USA.
Daniel M TrifilettiMayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.
Jeffrey V SiebersRadiation Oncology Department, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
University of Virginia · USArizona Oncology · USCity Of Hope National Medical Center · USEmory University · USJacksonville College · USOaks Hospital · GBThomas Jefferson University · USVanderbilt University Medical Center · US

Funding

Comprehensive analysis and mitigation of the clinical effects of delineation and geometric uncertainties in conformal radiation therapyR01CA222216 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI SIEBERS, JEFFREY VINCENT · 2018 to 2023
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA222216NIH HHS R01-CA222216-01A1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo reduce the likelihood of errors in organ delineations used for radiotherapy treatment planning, a knowledge-based quality control (KBQC) system, which discriminates between valid and anomalous delineations is developed. METHOD AND MATERIALS: The KBQC is comprised of a group-wise inference system and anomaly detection modules trained using historical priors from 296 locally advanced lung and prostate cancer patient computational tomographies (CTs). The inference system discriminates different organs based on shape, relational, and intensity features. For a given delineated image set, the inference system solves a combinatorial optimization problem that results in an organ group whose relational features follow those of the training set considering the posterior probabilities obtained from support vector machine (SVM), discriminant subspace ensemble (DSE), and artificial neural network (ANN) classifiers. These classifiers are trained on nonrelational features with a 10-fold cross-validation scheme. The anomaly detection module is a bank of ANN autoencoders, each corresponding with an organ, trained on nonrelational features. A heuristic rule detects anomalous organs that exceed predefined organ-specific tolerances for the feature reconstruction error and the classifier's posterior probabilities. Independent data sets with anomalous delineations were used to test the overall performance of the KBQC system. The anomalous delineations were manually manipulated, computer-generated, or propagated based on a transformation obtained by imperfect registrations. Both peer-review-based scoring system and shape similarity coefficient (DSC) were used to label regions of interest (ROIs) as normal or anomalous in two independent test cohorts.

resultsThe accuracy of the classifiers was

conclusionThe KBQC system detected anomalous delineations with superior accuracy compared to classification methods that judge only based on posterior probabilities.

Indexed as

Prostatic NeoplasmsRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedHumansMaleNeural Networks, ComputerQuality ControlRadiotherapy Dosageanomaly detectionmachine learningorgans at riskradiation therapysegmentation quality assurance

Identifiers

PMID35028948
PMCPMC13648192
OpenAlexW4205660560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.