ReviewReproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)2022
Application of Tissue-Specific Extracellular Matrix in Tissue Engineering: Focus on Male Fertility Preservation.
Review in Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bioengineering Approaches for Male Infertility: From Microenvironmental Regeneration to in vitro Fertilization.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025Review
- Current Status of Fertility Preservation in Pediatric Oncology Patients.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Biomimetic Scaffolds-A Novel Approach to Three Dimensional Cell Culture Techniques for Potential Implementation in Tissue Engineering.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- The Effect of Multilayered Electrospun PLLA Nanofibers Coated with Human Amnion or Bladder ECM Proteins on Epithelialization and Smooth Muscle Regeneration in the Rabbit Bladder.Macromolecular bioscience · 2024Article
- Decellularized extracellular matrix for organoid and engineered organ culture.Journal of tissue engineeringReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In vitro spermatogenesis and xenotransplantation of the immature testicular tissues (ITT) are the experimental approaches that have been developed for creating seminiferous tubules-like functional structures in vitro and keeping the integrity of the ITTs in vivo, respectively. These strategies are rapidly developing in response to the growing prevalence of infertility in adolescent boys undergoing cancer treatment, by the logic that there is no sperm cryopreservation option for them. Recently, with the advances made in the field of tissue engineering and biomaterials, these methods have achieved promising results for fertility preservation. Due to the importance of extracellular matrix for the formation of vascular bed around the grafted ITTs and also the creation of spatial arrangements between Sertoli cells and germ cells, today it is clear that the scaffold plays a very important role in the success of these methods. Decellularized extracellular matrix (dECM) as a biocompatible, functionally graded, and biodegradable scaffold with having tissue-specific components and growth factors can support reorganization and physiologic processes of originated cells. This review discusses the common protocols for the tissue decellularization, sterilization, and hydrogel formation of the decellularized and lyophilized tissues as well as in vitro and in vivo studies on the use of the testis-derived dECM for testicular organoids.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.