Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35028879›Full record

ReviewAnnals of nuclear medicine2022

Radiotherapy planning of lymphomas: role of metabolic imaging with PET/CT.

Michael J McKay, Kim L Taubman, Szeting Lee, Andrew M Scott

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of nuclear medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Michael J McKayNorthern Cancer Service, North West Cancer Centre, Burnie, TAS, 7320, Australia. michael.mckay@ths.tas.gov.au.
Kim L TaubmanDepartment of Medical Imaging, St Vincents Hospital, Fitzroy, VIC, 3065, Australia.
Szeting LeeDepartment of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Austin Health, 145 Studley Road, Heidelberg, VIC, 3084, Australia.
Andrew M ScottOlivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Austin Health · AULa Trobe University · AUNorth West Regional Hospital · AUSt Vincent's Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate target delineation is an absolute requirement for modern radiotherapy planning. Historically, structural imaging modalities have been used for this purpose, but there is a considerable role for functional imaging with PET/CT to contribute in this area. PET/CT's role in radiotherapy planning is well established and its use is indispensable in the clinical management of the lymphomas, particularly Hodgkin Lymphoma. A crucial use of PET/CT is as a baseline scan for delineation of the initial lymphomatous involvement, since this will determine the contouring of the gross-, clinical- and planning-target volumes (GTV, CTV, PTV). This article reviews the principles of contemporary radiotherapy, examines the evidence for the contribution of PET/CT to radiotherapy planning in lymphoma and the practicalities and challenges of applying this powerful technology to this situation.

Indexed as

Hodgkin DiseasePositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyHumansPositron-Emission TomographyRadiopharmaceuticalsRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedTomography, X-Ray ComputedRadiopharmaceuticalsLymphomaMetabolic imagingPETRadiotherapy planning

Identifiers

PMID35028879
OpenAlexW4205275156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.