Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35028824›Full record

ArticleJournal of psycholinguistic research2023

Pupil Dilation Response to Prosody and Syntax During Auditory Sentence Processing.

Özgür Aydın, İpek Pınar Uzun

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of psycholinguistic research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Özgür AydınDepartment of Linguistics, Faculty of Languages and History-Geography, Ankara University, No 45/45A, Sıhhiye, 06100, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2925-4146
İpek Pınar UzunDepartment of Linguistics, Faculty of Languages and History-Geography, Ankara University, No 45/45A, Sıhhiye, 06100, Ankara, Turkey. bekar@ankara.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3103-0758
Ankara University · TR

Funding

Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştirma Kurumu 112K394
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pupil dilation response has been shown to reflect different levels of sentence processing during prosodic and syntactic processing in language comprehension. Our pupillometry experiment aimed to investigate whether pupil diameter was sensitive to the auditory sentence processing involved in comprehending congruent and incongruent statements. Twenty-one participants were presented with 300 auditory stimuli consisting of syntactically and/or prosodically congruent and incongruent sentences in Turkish. The pupillary response results were significant only for syntactically incongruent sentences and for sentences that were both syntactically and prosodically incongruent. This indicates that prosody had no significant effect on its own. Based on the hypothesis that prosodic and syntactic processing require cognitive sensitivity for auditory sentence comprehension, we expected an increase in pupil diameter for both processes. However, our findings are consistent with the previous assumptions that pupil size increases during syntactic manipulation, but our findings showed that prosodic processing does not increase pupil size, contrary to previous studies.

Indexed as

PupilSpeech PerceptionAuditory PerceptionComprehensionHumansLanguageAuditory stimuliFocusPost-verbal positionProsodyPupillometrySyntax

Identifiers

PMID35028824
OpenAlexW4206259844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.