ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2022
Updates in Cerebral Venous Thrombosis.
Review in Current cardiology reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bilateral thalamic infarction secondary to internal cerebral vein thrombosis in a postpartum patient: a rare case report.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Article
- Complex Venous Thromboembolism in a Young Woman With Multisystem Manifestations: A Case Report.Cureus · 2025Article
- Cerebral Venous Thrombosis: Selected Persisting Areas of Uncertainty.Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology · 2025Article
- Development and validation of a score for clinical deterioration in patients with cerebral venous thrombosis.Neurosurgical review · 2025Observational
- Mechanical Thrombectomy for Cerebral Venous Sinus Occlusion Due to Ewing Sarcoma: A Case Report.Journal of neuroendovascular therapy · 2025Article
- Observational
- Article
- Knowledge and Perceptions of Cerebral Venous Thrombosis Among the Adult Population: A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study in Saudi Arabia.International journal of general medicine · 2024Article
- Article
- Outcome Prediction in Cerebral Venous Thrombosis: The IN-REvASC Score.Journal of stroke · 2022Article
- Global Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Cerebral Venous Thrombosis and Mortality.Journal of stroke · 2022Article
- Efficacy and Safety Assessment of Rivaroxaban for the Treatment of Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis in a Chinese Population.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/HemostasisArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewCerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) is a rare cause of stroke that most commonly affects younger women. Here, we review new literature relevant to the management and prognosis of individuals with CVT and ongoing areas of uncertainty. RECENT
findingsDirect-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are being increasingly integrated into routine care but are not yet recommended by guidelines. Recent randomized clinical trials and available case series offer reassuring safety data. Routine use of endovascular therapy is not associated with improved outcomes. The relationship between recanalization and prognosis is uncertain. The evidence base for management of CVT continues to improve. Ongoing areas of uncertainty include duration of therapy and whether certain subgroups of patients may benefit from neurointervention or personalized approaches to antithrombotic strategy. The state of knowledge will continue to benefit from large collaborative international efforts, and integration of patient partnerships to identify research priorities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.