Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35028806›Full record

ArticleArchives of sexual behavior2022

Sexual Health and the Pandemic Crisis: Testing the Role of Psychological Vulnerability/Protective Factors on Sexual Functioning and Sexual Distress During a Critical Life Period in Portugal.

Pedro Nobre, Pedro J Rosa, Priscila Vasconcelos, Inês Tavares, Joana Carvalho, Ana Quinta-Gomes, Catarina Moura, Mariana Carrito

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of sexual behavior, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Pedro NobreFaculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Center for Psychology at University of Porto, University of Porto, 4200-135, Porto, Portugal. pnobre5@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-2571-6972
Pedro J RosaLusófona University, Digital Human-Environment Interaction Lab, Lisbon, Portugal.
Priscila VasconcelosFaculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Center for Psychology at University of Porto, University of Porto, 4200-135, Porto, Portugal.
Inês TavaresFaculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Center for Psychology at University of Porto, University of Porto, 4200-135, Porto, Portugal.
Joana CarvalhoFaculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Center for Psychology at University of Porto, University of Porto, 4200-135, Porto, Portugal.
Ana Quinta-GomesFaculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Center for Psychology at University of Porto, University of Porto, 4200-135, Porto, Portugal.
Catarina MouraFaculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Center for Psychology at University of Porto, University of Porto, 4200-135, Porto, Portugal.
Mariana CarritoFaculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Center for Psychology at University of Porto, University of Porto, 4200-135, Porto, Portugal.
Universidade do Porto · PTInstituto Superior Manuel Teixeira Gomes · PT

Funding

Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia FCT UIDB/00050/2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent findings suggest that the current COVID-19 pandemic has a potential negative impact in several areas of life, including sexual health. However, less is known about the psychological dimensions that may work as vulnerability/protective factors for the development of sexual problems in the current pandemic. The current study used a longitudinal design to examine the role played by personality trait factors (neuroticism, extraversion) as well as psychosexual factors (sexual beliefs) in predicting sexual functioning and sexual distress across time during the current pandemic crisis. A total of 528 individuals (337 women) completed a web survey assessing sexual health indicators and psychological factors. The first wave was conducted during the confinement period in Portugal (N = 528) between May and June 2020 and the second four months later (N = 146), when strict confinement rules were over. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to examine the ability of psychological factors to predict sexual functioning and distress across time, while controlling for age and gender. Results indicated that sexual distress at time point 2 was lower than during confinement, and men had lower levels of sexual functioning post-confinement while no significant difference was observed for women. Moreover, higher levels of neuroticism and age-related beliefs significantly predicted lower sexual functioning as well as higher sexual distress, whereas lower levels of extraversion predicted lower sexual functioning after controlling for age and gender effects. Findings support the role of psychological vulnerability factors to predict sexual problems across time and may have important implications in the prevention and treatment of sexual dysfunctions.

Indexed as

COVID-19Sexual HealthFemaleHumansMalePandemicsPortugalProtective FactorsSARS-CoV-2Surveys and QuestionnairesCOVID-19 pandemicPersonality factorsSexual beliefsSexual distressSexual functioning

Identifiers

PMID35028806
PMCPMC8757627
OpenAlexW4205342324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.