ReviewJournal of experimental orthopaedics2022
Limited evidence for graft selection in pediatric ACL reconstruction: a narrative review.
Review in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluating Thigh Muscle Volume and Compensatory Muscle Changes in Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone, Hamstring Autograft, and Allograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructions: A Minimum 5-Year Follow-up.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2026Article
- Age-Related Increases in Graft Tendon Size and Stiffness During Skeletal Growth Enhance Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft Function and Joint Stability in an Early Adolescent Porcine Model.Journal of biomechanical engineering · 2026Article
- Thigh Muscle Volume Remains Decreased on 3-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging at Minimum of 5 Years After Patellar Tendon but not Allograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation · 2025Article
- One type of graft for reconstruction of the ACL does not suit all patients based on their characteristics and sports: a scoping review.Musculoskeletal surgery · 2025Article
- Adolescent ACL Reconstruction Using Quadriceps or Hamstring Tendon Autografts: A Comparative Study of Muscle Strength and Patient-Reported Outcomes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Comparison of autograft and allograft outcomes in adolescent ACL reconstruction: a propensity score analysis.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2025Article
- ACL Reconstruction in Skeletally Immature Athletes: Current Concepts.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- Surgical techniques in the management of pediatric anterior cruciate ligament tears: Current concepts.Journal of children's orthopaedics · 2023Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is the preferred treatment to anterior cruciate ligament injury. With the increase in anterior cruciate ligament injuries in both adults and skeletally immature patients comes the need for individualized anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction graft selection whether it is the type of graft (auto vs. allograft) or the harvesting site (hamstrings, iliotibial band, quadriceps, patella). Several factors need to be considered preoperatively in order to optimize the patients' recovery and restore anterior cruciate ligament strength and function. These include age and bone maturity, preoperative knee flexor/extensor strength, sport participation, patient's needs and anatomical characteristics. This paper aims at bringing evidence supporting the use of a personalized approach in graft selection for faster and more efficient return to sport and propose a theoretical framework to support the approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.