Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35028766›Full record

ArticleLasers in medical science2022

Laser-photobiomodulation on titanium implant bone healing in rat model: comparison between 660- and 808-nm wavelength.

Guilherme Aparecido Monteiro Duque da Fonseca, Marcos Fernando Xisto Braga Cavalcanti, José Daniel de Souza Maior, Juliana da Silva Pereira, Leandro Augusto Pinto, Murilo Matias, Lucio Frigo

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Lasers in medical science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Guilherme Aparecido Monteiro Duque da FonsecaPeriodontology Program of Guarulhos University, praça Teresa Cristina 01, Guarulhos, São Paulo, SP, Cep 07023-070, Brazil. Guilherme.fonseca1210@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0249-8191
Marcos Fernando Xisto Braga CavalcantiSchool of Dentistry, Nove de Julho University, Rua Vergueiro 235, São Paulo, SP, Cep 01504-001, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0334-3423
José Daniel de Souza MaiorExperimental Surgery Department of Pernambuco Federal University, Av. Prof. Moraes Rego, 1235 - Cidade Universitária, Recife, PE, Cep 50670-901, Brazil.
Juliana da Silva PereiraPeriodontology Program of Guarulhos University, praça Teresa Cristina 01, Guarulhos, São Paulo, SP, Cep 07023-070, Brazil.
Leandro Augusto PintoPeriodontology Program of Guarulhos University, praça Teresa Cristina 01, Guarulhos, São Paulo, SP, Cep 07023-070, Brazil.
Murilo MatiasImplantology Program of Guarulhos University, praça Teresa Cristina 01, Guarulhos, São Paulo, Cep 07023-070, Brazil.
Lucio FrigoImplantology Program of Guarulhos University, praça Teresa Cristina 01, Guarulhos, São Paulo, Cep 07023-070, Brazil. luciofrigo@uol.com.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9131-1071
Guarulhos University · BRUniversidade Federal de Pernambuco · BRUniversidade Nove de Julho · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Laser-photobiomodulation (L-PBM) has been widely studied and its biomodulatory effects have been established on irradiated cells, increasing viability and proliferation and on damaged tissues. In addition, L-PBM may reduce and modulate the inflammatory process. The effect of 660-nm and 808-nm laser-photobiomodulation on bone repair around titanium dental implants placed in rat's femur was evaluated by histomorphometry. Twenty-seven Wistar rats were divided into 3 groups of nine animals: group C - non-irradiated control; group R - λ=660nm irradiated; and group IR - λ=808nm irradiated. Each group was further divided in 3 subgroups of three animals each, according to histomorphometry analysis in 3 days, 7 days, and 14 days after irradiation. Histological H.E.-stained slides were photographed, and bone matrix measured in new-formed bone area. Bone matrix histomorphometry analysis indicates that at 7 days in the irradiated groups (R and IR), a bigger area matrix was observed in relation to control group (C) (p=0.04 and p=0.048 respectively). On the other hand, at 14 days, control group (C) presented a bigger area than infrared irradiated (IR) (p=0.001) and red irradiated group (R) also showed a bigger area than infrared irradiated group (IR) (p=0.019). Histological analysis indicates that irradiated groups (R and IR) exhibited a faster bone tissue matrix production than control group.

Indexed as

Low-Level Light TherapyTitaniumAnimalsFemurLasersRatsRats, WistarTitaniumBone healingLow-level laser therapyPhotobiomodulationTitanium implant

Identifiers

PMID35028766
OpenAlexW4205773028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.