Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35028754›Full record

ArticleOecologia2022

Mitigating impacts of invasive alien predators on an endangered sea duck amidst high native predation pressure.

Kim Jaatinen, Ida Hermansson, Bertille Mohring, Benjamin B Steele, Markus Öst

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Oecologia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Health Status of Bycaught Common Eiders (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kim JaatinenNature and Game Management Trust Finland, Degerbyvägen 176, 10160, Degerby, Finland. kim.jaatinen@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5568-5647
Ida HermanssonEnvironmental and Marine Biology, Åbo Akademi University, Henriksgatan 2, 20500, Turku, Finland.
Bertille MohringEnvironmental and Marine Biology, Åbo Akademi University, Henriksgatan 2, 20500, Turku, Finland.
Benjamin B SteeleSchool of Arts and Sciences, Colby-Sawyer College, 541 Main St, New London, NH, 03257, USA.
Markus ÖstEnvironmental and Marine Biology, Åbo Akademi University, Henriksgatan 2, 20500, Turku, Finland.

Funding

svenska kulturfonden 13/2654svenska kulturfonden 138139svenska kulturfonden 14/2657svenska kulturfonden 149014svenska kulturfonden 15/3296svenska kulturfonden 158026svenska kulturfonden 16/1476svenska kulturfonden 17/3317
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anthropogenically introduced invasive species represent a major threat to global biodiversity by causing population declines and extinctions of native species. The negative impacts of introduced predators are well documented, yet a fundamental knowledge gap exists regarding the efficiency of potential mitigation methods to restore the ecosystem. Other understudied aspects concern prey behavioural antipredator responses and the historical context of native predator-prey interactions, which may moderate invasion impacts on native prey. Invasion impacts of American mink (Neovison vison) and raccoon dog (Nyctereutes procyonoides) into the Baltic Sea archipelago are poorly understood, and the efficiency of removal efforts as a means to alleviate depredation pressure on native prey is debated. Here, we examine the effectiveness of invasive predator removal on ground-nesting female common eider (Somateria mollissima) mortality, breeding success and breeding propensity over a 9-year period, while controlling for predation risk imposed by the main native predator, the white-tailed eagle (Haliaeetus albicilla). Our results clearly show that intensified removal of American minks and raccoon dogs decreased the number of female eiders killed during nesting, while improving both nesting success and breeding propensity. Such obvious positive effects of invasive predator removal are particularly noteworthy against the backdrop of a soaring eagle population, indicating that the impacts of invasives may become accentuated when native predators differ taxonomically and by hunting mode. This study shows that invasive alien predator removal is an effective conservation measure clearly aiding native fauna even under severe native predation pressure. Such cost-effective conservation actions call for governmental deployment across large areas.

Indexed as

EaglesPredatory BehaviorAnimalsDucksEcosystemFemaleIntroduced SpeciesAvian conservationCommon eiderEcosystem restorationInvasive speciesPredator control

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.