ArticleEuropean radiology2022
Myocardial T2 values at 1.5 T by a segmental approach with healthy aging and gender.
Article in European radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Cardiac magnetic resonance in Pompe disease: a systematic literature review.La Radiologia medica · 2026Pooled it
- Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance reference values ("normal values") in cardiovascular magnetic resonance: 2025 update.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2025Guideline
- Impact of Deep Learning-Based Reconstruction on the Accuracy and Precision of Cardiac Tissue Characterization.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The effect of age and sex on T1, T2, and T2* relaxation time constants in cardiac MRI in healthy Finnish population.Acta radiologica open · 2026Article
- Liver Tissue Mapping in Transfusion-Dependent β-Thalassemia: Reproducibility and Clinical Insights from Multiparametric MRI.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Double-Chambered Left Ventricle: How Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Overturned the Diagnosis.JACC. Case reports · 2025Article
- The correlation between stiffness and viscoelasticity of the myometrium in adenomyosis: a prospective study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Biatrial and Biventricular Reference Ranges Based on Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in Sickle Cell Disease Patients Without Heart Damage.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Analysis of myocardial T1, T2, and T2* values by age, sex, and cardiac segments in normal population: a prospective study.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2024Article
- Cardiac MRI TRadiology advances · 2024Article
- Liver T1 and T2 mapping in a large cohort of healthy subjects: normal ranges and correlation with age and sex.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2024Article
- A biomarker framework for cardiac aging: the Aging Biomarker Consortium consensus statement.Life medicine · 2023Article
- Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance for the Evaluation of Arrhythmogenic Substrates in Patients with Systemic Autoimmunity: An Update.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Review
- Medical Radiology: Current Progress.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Left Ventricle Detection from Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Relaxometry Images Using Visual Transformer.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- The Road Toward Reproducibility of Parametric Mapping of the Heart: A Technical Review.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Review
- Myocardial T1 and T2 values are associated with patient age in healthy pediatric heart transplant recipients.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic ResonanceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesOur aims were to obtain myocardial regional and global T2 values as a reference for normality for the first time using a GE scanner and to assess their association with physiological variables.
methodsOne hundred healthy volunteers aged 20-70 years (50% females) underwent cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Basal, mid-ventricular, and apical short-axis slices of the left ventricle were acquired by a multi-echo fast-spin-echo (MEFSE) sequence. Image analysis was performed with a commercially available software package. The T2 value was assessed in all 16 myocardial segments and the global value was the mean.
resultsThe global T2 value averaged across all subjects was 52.2 ± 2.5 ms (range: 47.0-59.9 ms). Inter-study, intra-observer, and inter-observer reproducibility was good (coefficient of variation < 5%). 3.6% of the segments was excluded because of artifacts and/or partial-volume effects. Segmental T2 values differed significantly (p < 0.0001), with the lowest value in the basal anterolateral segment (50.0 ± 3.5 ms) and the highest in the apical lateral segment (54.9 ± 5.1 ms). Mean T2 was significantly lower in the basal slice compared to both mid-ventricular and apical slices and in the mid-ventricular slice than in the apical slice. Aging was associated with increased segmental and global T2 values. Females showed higher T2 values than males. T2 values were not correlated to heart rate. A significant inverse correlation was detected between global T2 values and mean wall thickness.
conclusionsThe optimized MEFSE sequence allows for robust and reproducible quantification of segmental T2 values. Gender- and age-specific segmental reference values must be defined for distinguishing healthy and diseased myocardium. KEY POINTS: • In healthy subjects, T2 values differ among myocardial segments and are influenced by age and gender. • Normal T2 values in the myocardium, usable as a benchmark by other GE sites, were established.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35028749What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.