ArticleCell and tissue research2022
Phenotypic, trophic, and regenerative properties of mesenchymal stem cells from different osseous tissues.
Article in Cell and tissue research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Extracellular matrix-inspired multi-morphology microspheres harness osteogenic-prone stem cells to recruit and reprogram adjacent stem cells for synergistic bone regeneration.Journal of advanced research · 2026Article
- Hesperetin modulates osteoprogenitor cells and macrophages under zoledronic acid and inflammatory stress.Archives of oral biology · 2026Article
- Microenvironment-mediated stem cell fate in periodontal tissue remodeling and repair.Bioactive materials · 2026Review
- Engineering Approaches to Modify Immunomodulatory Functions of Mesenchymal Stromal Cells (MSCs): Tissue Regeneration and Clinical Application.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Primary cilia gene defects in BMSCs induce idiopathic scoliosis.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2025Article
- Impact of Photobiomodulation on the Pro-Osteogenic Activity of Dental Pulp Mesenchymal Stem/Stromal Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Niche-inspired collagen infused melt electrowritten scaffolds for craniofacial bone regeneration.Biomaterials advances · 2025Article
- Article
- Conditioned media of deer antler stem cells accelerate regeneration of alveolar bone defects in rats.Cell proliferation · 2023Article
- Histoarchitecture of the fibrillary matrix of human fetal posterior tibial tendons.Scientific reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have broad-based therapeutic potential in regenerative medicine. However, a major barrier to their clinical utility is that MSCs from different tissues are highly variable in their regenerative properties. In this study, we defined the molecular and phenotypic identities of different MSC populations from different osseous tissue sites of different patients and, additionally, determined their respective regenerative properties. MSCs from 6 patients were isolated from either bone marrow of the iliac crest (BMSCs) or alveolar bone tissue (aBMSCs), and flow cytometry revealed that regardless of the tissue source, MSC immunotypes had the same expression of MSC markers CD73, CD90, and CD105. However, transcriptomic analyses revealed 589 genes differentially expressed (DE) between BMSCs and aBMSCs, including eightfold higher levels of bone morphogenetic protein 4 (BMP-4) in aBMSCs. In striking contrast, gene expression of MSCs derived from the same tissue, but between different patients (i.e., BMSCs to BMSCs, aBMSCs to aBMSCs), showed only 38 DE BMSC genes and 51 DE aBMSC genes. A protein array showed that aBMSC and BMSC produced equivalent levels of angiogenic cytokines; however, when placed in angiogenesis model systems, aBMSCs induced significantly more capillaries in vitro and in vivo. Finally, cell transplantation of MSCS into osseous defects showed that the bone regenerative capacity of aBMSCs was significantly greater than that of BMSCs. This study is the first to link the molecular, phenotypic, and regenerative properties of different MSCs from different patients and provides novel insights toward MSC differences based on the osseous tissue origin.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.