ArticleClinical rheumatology2022
Validation of the psoriasis epidemiology screening tool (PEST) and the new early arthritis for psoriatic patients (EARP) in pediatric population: pilot study.
Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of Different Therapeutic Approaches on Redox Balance in Psoriatic Patients.Biomedicines · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveJuvenile psoriatic arthritis (JPsA) is a severe inflammatory arthritis, which is associated with psoriasis in most cases. While there are few validated screening tools for diagnosis of arthritis for adult patients with psoriasis, those screening tools were never evaluated in children. The aims of this study were to evaluate two screening tools among pediatric patients with psoriasis.
methodsThirty-nine patients with the diagnosis of psoriasis completed two screening questionnaires: The Psoriasis Epidemiology Screening Tool (PEST) questionnaire and the new Early Arthritis for Psoriatic Patients (EARP) questionnaire. All patients were evaluated by a rheumatologist for the diagnosis of JPsA, and the accuracy of the two questionnaires was compared.
resultsThe 4/39 (10.1%) patients diagnosed with JPsA had a PEST questionnaire score of ≥ 3, compared to a median PEST score of the patients without the diagnosis of JPsA of 0 (0-2). Thus, both the sensitivity and specificity of the PEST in diagnosing JPsA were 100%. For the EARP questionnaire, 8/39 patients had a screening questionnaire score of ≥ 3, suggestive of JPsA, four were true positive, and four false positive. Thus, the sensitivity and specificity of EARP in diagnosing JPsA were 100% and 89%, respectively.
conclusionBoth the PEST and EARP questionnaires were easy to use and had high sensitivity for the diagnosis of JPsA in the pediatric population with psoriasis. The PEST questionnaire had a higher specificity than the EARP. KEY POINTS: • EARP and PEST are good screening tools for diagnosis of arthritis in pediatric population with psoriasis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.