SynthesisBMJ nutrition, prevention & health2021
Fruit and vegetable consumption and the risk of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies.
Synthesis in BMJ nutrition, prevention & health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
69 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 111 citations in OpenAlex.
- Vegetarian and vegan diets and cancer incidence: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies.European journal of epidemiology · 2026Pooled it
- Effects of Dietary Fruit and Vegetable Consumption on Prediabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Nutrients · 2026Pooled it
- Blood lipids and the risk of aortic aneurysm: results from the UK Biobank study and a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies.European journal of epidemiology · 2026Pooled it
- Total and specific potato intake and risk of type 2 diabetes: results from three US cohort studies and a substitution meta-analysis of prospective cohorts.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2025Pooled it
- Whole grain and refined grain consumption and the risk of hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies.Scientific reports · 2025Pooled it
- Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses on Consumption of Different Food Groups and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Syndrome.The Journal of nutrition · 2025Pooled it
- Heterogeneity in diet-related non-communicable disease risks in a Chinese population.European journal of nutrition · 2024Pooled it
- Fruit and vegetable consumption and the risk of hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies.European journal of nutrition · 2023Pooled it
- Fruit, vegetable, and fruit juice consumption and risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis : List of all authors.Nutrition journal · 2023Pooled it
- The association between body mass index, abdominal fatness, and weight change and the risk of adult asthma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies.Scientific reports · 2023Pooled it
- Cruciferous vegetables improve glycaemic control compared to root/squash vegetables in a randomized, controlled, crossover trial: The VEgetableS for vaScular hEaLth (VESSEL) study.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2025Trial
- Trial
- Dietary Adherence and Physical Activity in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Southwest Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study.Nutrients · 2026Article
- Association between the lifelines diet score and the odds of prediabetes and type 2 diabetes mellitus in Iranian adults: a cross-sectional study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Educational disparities in the association of protein diversity and type 2 diabetes: a multi-country population-based prospective case-cohort study.European journal of nutrition · 2026Article
- Higher vegetable intake is associated with lower diabetes risk: cross-sectional evidence from the STEPS 2016 survey in Iran.Journal of health, population, and nutrition · 2026Article
- Diabetes prevalence and associated risk factors among adults in rural Herat province, Afghanistan: a community-based cross-sectional study.BMC public health · 2026Article
- The associations of plasma carotenoids andThe British journal of nutrition · 2026Article
- Smoking, GAD65 autoimmunity, genetic susceptibility to type 1 diabetes and incident adult-onset diabetes in the EPIC-InterAct case-cohort study.Metabologia · 2026Article
- Editorial: Eating behavior and chronic diseases: research evidence from population studies, volume II.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe association between intake of fruit and vegetables and their subtypes, and the risk of type 2 diabetes has been investigated in several studies, but the results have been inconsistent.
objectiveWe conducted an updated systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies on intakes of fruit and vegetables and fruit and vegetable subtypes and the risk of type 2 diabetes.
designPubMed and Embase databases were searched up to 20 October 2020. Prospective cohort studies of fruit and vegetable consumption and type 2 diabetes mellitus were included. Summary relative risks (RRs) and 95% CIs were estimated using a random effects model.
resultsWe included 23 cohort studies. The summary RR for high versus low intake and per 200 g/day were 0.93 (95% CI: 0.89 to 0.98, I
conclusionsThis meta-analysis found a weak inverse association between fruit and vegetable intake and type 2 diabetes risk. There is indication of both inverse and positive associations between intake of several fruit and vegetables subtypes and type 2 diabetes risk, however, further studies are needed before firm conclusions can be made.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.