Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35028420›Full record

ReviewSustainable energy & fuels2021

Valorisation of xylose to renewable fuels and chemicals, an essential step in augmenting the commercial viability of lignocellulosic biorefineries.

Vivek Narisetty, Rylan Cox, Rajesh Bommareddy, Deepti Agrawal, Ejaz Ahmad, Kamal Kumar Pant, Anuj Kumar Chandel, Shashi Kant Bhatia, Dinesh Kumar, Parmeswaran Binod and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sustainable energy & fuels, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 121 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Synthetic and systems biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. HMicrobial cell factories · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 10 institutions in 4 countries.

Vivek NarisettySchool of Water, Energy and Environment, Cranfield University Cranfield MK43 0AL UK Vinod.Kumar@cranfield.ac.uk +44 (0)1234754786.
Rylan CoxSchool of Water, Energy and Environment, Cranfield University Cranfield MK43 0AL UK Vinod.Kumar@cranfield.ac.uk +44 (0)1234754786.
Rajesh BommareddyDepartment of Applied Sciences, Northumbria University Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 8ST UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3071-3453
Deepti AgrawalBiochemistry and Biotechnology Area, Material Resource Efficiency Division, CSIR- Indian Institute of Petroleum Mohkampur Dehradun 248005 India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6224-3580
Ejaz AhmadDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (ISM) Dhanbad 826004 India.
Kamal Kumar PantDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi New Delhi 110016 India.
Anuj Kumar ChandelDepartment of Biotechnology, Engineering School of Lorena (EEL), University of São Paulo Lorena 12.602.810 Brazil.
Shashi Kant BhatiaDepartment of Biological Engineering, College of Engineering, Konkuk University Seoul 05029 Republic of Korea.
Dinesh KumarSchool of Bioengineering & Food Technology, Shoolini University of Biotechnology and Management Sciences Solan 173229 Himachal Pradesh India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3485-6408
Parmeswaran BinodMicrobial Processes and Technology Division, CSIR-National Institute for Interdisciplinary Science and Technology (CSIR-NIIST) Thiruvananthapuram 695 019 Kerala India.
Vijai Kumar GuptaScotland's Rural College Barony Campus Dumfries DG1 3NE UK.
Vinod KumarSchool of Water, Energy and Environment, Cranfield University Cranfield MK43 0AL UK Vinod.Kumar@cranfield.ac.uk +44 (0)1234754786.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8967-6119
Cranfield University · GBIndian Institute of Technology Delhi · INIndian Institute of Petroleum · INIndian Institute of Technology Dhanbad · INKonkuk University · KRNational Institute for Interdisciplinary Science and Technology · INNorthumbria University · GBScotland's Rural College · GBShoolini University · INUniversidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biologists and engineers are making tremendous efforts in contributing to a sustainable and green society. To that end, there is growing interest in waste management and valorisation. Lignocellulosic biomass (LCB) is the most abundant material on the earth and an inevitable waste predominantly originating from agricultural residues, forest biomass and municipal solid waste streams. LCB serves as the renewable feedstock for clean and sustainable processes and products with low carbon emission. Cellulose and hemicellulose constitute the polymeric structure of LCB, which on depolymerisation liberates oligomeric or monomeric glucose and xylose, respectively. The preferential utilization of glucose and/or absence of the xylose metabolic pathway in microbial systems cause xylose valorization to be alienated and abandoned, a major bottleneck in the commercial viability of LCB-based biorefineries. Xylose is the second most abundant sugar in LCB, but a non-conventional industrial substrate unlike glucose. The current review seeks to summarize the recent developments in the biological conversion of xylose into a myriad of sustainable products and associated challenges. The review discusses the microbiology, genetics, and biochemistry of xylose metabolism with hurdles requiring debottlenecking for efficient xylose assimilation. It further describes the product formation by microbial cell factories which can assimilate xylose naturally and rewiring of metabolic networks to ameliorate xylose-based bioproduction in native as well as non-native strains. The review also includes a case study that provides an argument on a suitable pathway for optimal cell growth and succinic acid (SA) production from xylose through elementary flux mode analysis. Finally, a product portfolio from xylose bioconversion has been evaluated along with significant developments made through enzyme, metabolic and process engineering approaches, to maximize the product titers and yield, eventually empowering LCB-based biorefineries. Towards the end, the review is wrapped up with current challenges, concluding remarks, and prospects with an argument for intense future research into xylose-based biorefineries.

Identifiers

PMID35028420
PMCPMC8691124
OpenAlexW3208615827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.