Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35028411›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature2022

Subcutaneous ICD implantation under ultrasound-guided serratus anterior plane block: Single-center experience in the Netherlands.

Jan Elders, Hisham AlHashimi, Marc Gomes, Ivo Panhuizen, Sander van Kuijk, Kevin Vernooy

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. S-ICD Implantation "Tips and Tricks".Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jan EldersDepartment of Cardiology. Canisius Wilhelminahospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Hisham AlHashimiDepartment of Cardiology. Canisius Wilhelminahospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Marc GomesDepartment of Cardiology. Canisius Wilhelminahospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Ivo PanhuizenDepartment of Anesthesiology, Canisius Wilhelminahospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Sander van KuijkDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment (KEMTA), Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Kevin VernooyDepartment of Cardiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Canisius-Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis · NLMaastricht University · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTo avoid general anesthesia (GA) and improve postoperative pain management for subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) implantation there is a growing interest for alternative methods. We describe the first experience in the Netherlands of S-ICD implantation under Ultrasound-guided Serratus Anterior Plane Block (US-SAPB).

methodsUS-SAPB was performed 1 hour before S-ICD implantation. The two-incision technique was used and a pocket beneath the latissimus dorsi muscle was surgically created. Lidocaine was used to provide anesthesia of the skin. Sedation during defibrillation testing (DFT) was induced by intravenous Propofol. Periprocedural pain experience was monitored using the Numerical Rating Scale for Pain (NRS-Pain). The results were compared with a control group of patients undergoing S-ICD implantation under GA.

resultsForty consecutive patients (29 Male/11 Female, median age 59 years (range 34-84 years), median body mass index 26 (range 17-41) underwent S-ICD implantation; Twenty patients under US-SAPB and twenty under GA. Median procedure time was 42 min. (range 28-60 min.) with no differences between both groups. In both groups implantations went successful and defibrillation was accomplished using 65 J. US-SAPB was successful in 19 of the 20 patients and GA was successful in all cases. Median NRS-Pain in the US-SAPB group was 2 (range 2-6) and in the GA group 4 (range 2-6). In the US-SAPB group 5 patients required additional opioids postoperatively compared to 10 patients in the GA group.

conclusionsS-ICD implantation under US-SAPB is feasible, safe and reduces the need for postoperative opioids significantly. S-ICD implantation under US-SAPB seems a good alternative for GA.

Indexed as

Implantation techniquePrimary preventionSerratus anterior plane blockSubcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator

Identifiers

PMID35028411
PMCPMC8739453
OpenAlexW4205740700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.