Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35028273›Full record

ArticleJIMD reports2022

Comparing nitisinone 2 mg and 10 mg in the treatment of alkaptonuria-An approach using statistical modelling.

Lakshminarayan R Ranganath, Anna M Milan, Andrew T Hughes, Milad Khedr, Brendan P Norman, Mohammed Alsbou, Richard Imrich, Matthew Gornall, Nicolas Sireau, James A Gallagher and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JIMD reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Adequacy of nitisinone for the management of alkaptonuria.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Lakshminarayan R RanganathDepartments of Clinical Biochemistry and Metabolic Medicine Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trusts Liverpool UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4205-2269
Anna M MilanDepartments of Clinical Biochemistry and Metabolic Medicine Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trusts Liverpool UK.
Andrew T HughesDepartments of Clinical Biochemistry and Metabolic Medicine Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trusts Liverpool UK.
Milad KhedrDepartments of Clinical Biochemistry and Metabolic Medicine Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trusts Liverpool UK.
Brendan P NormanMusculoskeletal Biology and Ageing University of Liverpool, William Henry Duncan Building Liverpool UK.
Mohammed AlsbouFaculty of Medicine Mutah University Karak Jordan.
Richard ImrichNational Institute of Rheumatic Diseases Piešťany Slovakia.
Matthew GornallLiverpool Cancer Trials Unit University of Liverpool Liverpool UK.
Nicolas SireauAKU Society Cambridge UK.
James A GallagherMusculoskeletal Biology and Ageing University of Liverpool, William Henry Duncan Building Liverpool UK.
Richard JacksonLiverpool Cancer Trials Unit University of Liverpool Liverpool UK.
University of Liverpool · GBAlkaptonuria Society · GBBiomedical Research Center of the Slovak Academy of Sciences · SKMutah University · JO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOutcomes from studies employing nitisinone 10 mg and 2 mg in alkaptonuria were compared. PATIENTS AND

methodsSixty-nine patients in each of the nitisinone (10 mg daily) and controls of suitability of nitisinone in alkaptonuria 2 (SONIA 2), as well as 37 and 23 in nitisinone (2 mg daily) and control cohorts at the National Alkaptonuria Centre (NAC), respectively, were followed up for 4 years. Severity of alkaptonuria (AKU) was assessed by the AKU Severity Score Index (AKUSSI). 24-h urine homogentisic acid (uHGA

resultsThe slope of the AKUSSI was 0.55, 0.19, 0.30, and 0.06 per month in the control NAC, nitisinone NAC, control SONIA 2, and nitisinone SONIA 2 cohorts, respectively. The intersection of the slopes on the DISCUSSION: The nitisinone 10 mg dose decreased disease progression more than the 2 mg dose although the incidence of corneal keratopathy was 14.5% and 4.9%, respectively.

conclusionNitisinone 10 mg decreased urine and serum HGA, increased serum tyrosine, and decreased disease progression more than 2 mg. Low-protein dietetic support may be needed to mitigate tyrosinaemia following nitisinone. HIGHLIGHTS: Nitisinone 10 mg apparently slows alkaptonuria disease progression more than 2 mg in adults.Corneal keratopathy during nitisinone therapy was more common in men.Serum nitisinone concentrations increased significantly over time.Nitisinone may inhibit cytochrome P450 self catabolism.

Indexed as

AKUSSIalkaptonuriadisease progressionhomogentisic acidnitisinonesafetyslope analysis

Identifiers

PMID35028273
PMCPMC8743340
OpenAlexW3212457681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.