Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35028251›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2022

Early Experience Using a New Robotic Microsurgical System for Lymphatic Surgery.

Nicole Lindenblatt, Lisanne Grünherz, Anna Wang, Epameinondas Gousopoulos, Carlotta Barbon, Semra Uyulmaz, Pietro Giovanoli

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
20.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 98 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. The first total robotic-assisted lymphovenous anastomosis: prospects for innovation and future development.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026
    Article
  14. Review
  15. [Research progress of lymphaticovenous anastomosis in treatment of secondary lymphedema].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2026
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nicole LindenblattDepartment of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Lisanne GrünherzDepartment of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Anna WangDepartment of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Epameinondas GousopoulosDepartment of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Carlotta BarbonDepartment of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Semra UyulmazDepartment of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Pietro GiovanoliDepartment of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
University Hospital of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Robotic microsurgery has emerged as a new technology with potential benefits for reconstructive surgery. We report the first-in-human use of the Symani surgical system to perform lympho-venous and arterial anastomosis for lymphatic reconstruction. In five patients, 10 robot-assisted anastomoses were performed. Next to lympho-venous anastomoses, two patients received a free vascularized lymph node transfer. Motion scaling was set to 10×. Visualization was either achieved with a 3D system or an optical microscope. All anastomoses were patent as confirmed by ICG. Despite a longer time to perform the first anastomoses with the robot, we observed a decline in duration of anastomosis. Among the advantages of the system were a high accuracy in placing the stitches even in very small and fragile vessels or when performing anastomoses with size mismatches. The challenges encountered included the lack of a touch sensation and the necessity to develop a "see-feel." This could be achieved surprisingly well because the force necessary to close dilator and needle holder via the manipulators was perceived as comparable to using conventional micro instruments. Our data confirm feasibility and safety of the robotic system to perform lymphatic surgery. Larger patient cohorts and inclusion of surgeons at different training levels will be necessary to investigate the true potential of robotics in microsurgery. In addition, robot-assisted surgery shows a promising potential in opening up new frontiers in reconstructive microsurgery (eg, the reliable performance of anastomoses on even smaller blood and lymphatic vessels or on structures deeper within the body cavities-eg, the thoracic duct).

Identifiers

PMID35028251
PMCPMC8747501
OpenAlexW4205102336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.