Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35028111›Full record

ArticleJournal of dental sciences2022

Bibliometric analysis of articles published in journal of dental sciences from 2009 to 2020.

Fu-Hsuan Liu, Chuan-Hang Yu, Yu-Chao Chang

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of dental sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Mapping out the bibliometric characteristics ofJournal of dental sciences · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Haptic and Force Feedback Technology in Dental Education: A Bibliometric Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A Bibliometric Analysis of Platelet-Rich Fibrin in Dentistry.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Initiating gender mainstreaming in dentistry.Journal of dental sciences · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Fu-Hsuan LiuDepartment of Dentistry, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Chuan-Hang YuDepartment of Dentistry, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Yu-Chao ChangDepartment of Dentistry, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The bibliometric analysis was conducted to evaluate the publication characteristics of Journal of Dental Sciences (JDS) from ScienceDirect Online between 2009 and 2020. The most common published article type in JDS was original articles. The top four highest number of published articles were related to oral and maxillofacial surgery, periodontology, endodontology, and oral pathology. The most productive geographic region for articles was Asia. Taiwan ranked in the highest country in terms of successful publication in JDS. The impact factor of JDS ranged from 0.107 in 2009 to 2.080 in 2020. As compared with years between 2009 and 2014, there was a significant increase in impact factor during 2015-2020 (P = 0.026). By this bibliometric analysis, JDS needs to attract more audience outside the Asia to gain the higher international influence.

Indexed as

Bibliometric analysisImpact factorJournal of dental sciences

Identifiers

PMID35028111
PMCPMC8739797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.