ArticleJournal of dental sciences2022
Effects of a novel oral appliance on snoring in adults: A pilot study.
Article in Journal of dental sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association of Novel Oral Appliance Use With Heart Rate Variability in Adolescent Athletes.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026Article
- Impacts of an Oral Appliance on Snoring in Adults with Varying Degrees of Snoring Severity: A Preliminary Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractbackground/purposeOral appliances (OAs) have been recommended as alternatives for adult patients with obstructive sleep apnea who are intolerant of continuous positive airway pressure therapy. The aim of this study was to explore the effect on snoring rates among adult patients through use of a novel OA termed the Lin OA (LOA, airflow-interference-type nasal congestion relieving and snore-ceasing oral appliance). MATERIALS AND
methodsThe LOA consist of two parts: dental braces and a fixed tongue compressor. The compressor lengths range from 0.5 cm to 3.5 cm across versions. Patients used the LOA during sleep and the SnoreClock smartphone application recorded their snoring rates.
resultsA total of 4920 recordings (4239 recordings from 34 men, 681 recordings from 8 women) were used for the analysis. The recordings were sorted in accordance with the applied length of the LOA tongue compressor (0.5-3.5 cm, LOA-0.5, LOA-1 and LOA-3.5), and participants not using the LOA were denoted as the LOA-0 group. The women had higher snoring rates in the LOA-0, LOA-0.5 to LOA-2 groups, but lower snoring rates in the LOA-3 group than men by the univariate analysis. The snoring rates were significantly reduced by a mean of 5.04% with every 1 cm increase in tongue compressor length. Continuous LOA use resulted in snoring rate reductions of 0.02% per day by the random intercept model of the linear regression.
conclusionUse of this novel LOA may significantly reduce snoring rates by 5.04% with each 1 cm increase in tongue compressor length.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.