ArticleJournal of dental sciences2022
Biomechanical analysis of rigid and non-rigid connection with implant abutment designs for tooth-implant supported prosthesis: A finite element analysis.
Article in Journal of dental sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- The influence of the connector position placing, cement thickness and load direction on biomechanical performance of implant supported mesial cantilever: Finite element analysis.Journal of dental sciences · 2026Article
- Biomechanical analysis of porous and dense dental implant-supported bridges in healthy and osteoporotic bones.PloS one · 2025Article
- Biomechanics of Osseointegration of a Dental Implant in the Mandible Under Shock Wave Therapy: In Silico Study.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Influence of Connector Design on Displacement and Micromotion in Tooth-Implant Fixed Partial Dentures Using Different Lengths and Diameters: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Study.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Stress Analysis of Endodontically Treated Tooth-Implant Different Connectors Designs in Maxillary Posterior Region: A Finite Element Analysis.European journal of dentistry · 2024Article
- Analysis of the atrophic mandible rehabilitated with fixed total prosthesis on mono or bicortical implants.Brazilian dental journal · 2024Article
- Finite Element Analysis of Stress Distribution In Tooth-Implant Retained Prostheses: Impact of Periodontal Support, Tooth Count, and Implants : Stress Distribution in Tooth-Implant-Supported Prostheses.Galen medical journal · 2024Article
- Primary stability of implant placement and loading related to dental implant materials and designs: A literature review.Journal of dental sciences · 2023Review
- Biomechanical evaluation of bridge span with three implant abutment designs and two connectors for tooth-implant supported prosthesis: A finite element analysis.Journal of dental sciences · 2023Article
- Comparing the influence of cuspal angulation, occlusal loading, and connector widths between tooth- and implant-supported zirconia fixed dental prosthesis.Medical journal, Armed Forces IndiaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background/purposeThe design of the connectors and implant abutments could affect the stress distribution of the tooth-implant supported prosthesis (TISP) entire system after loading. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the stress distribution of the TISP in different connectors and different implant abutments after loading. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe TISP design used in this study was divided into six models. R1, R2 and R3 represented the tooth and the one-piece, two-piece and three-piece abutment implant system connected by a rigid connector, respectively, while NR1, NR2 and NR3 were the corresponding tooth-abutment implant systems connected by a non-rigid connector. A vertical occlusal load of 50 N was applied at a right angle on the 6 occlusal points of the occlusal surface.
resultsAs a result, regarding the maximum average stress distribution, R1 and NR1 appeared on the implant fixture, and the other four models were on the implant abutment. On the other hand, regardless of the abutment implant system, the maximum von Mises stress generated by the rigid connector was greater than the corresponding non-rigid connector in the cortical bone around implant. In addition, the three-piece abutment implant system had lower von Mises stress than the one-piece and two-piece implant systems in the cortical bone.
conclusionIt is concluded that by adding a flexible non-rigid connector and three-piece abutment device design to TISP, the occlusal load of the implant was dispersed, and the stress could be gradually introduced into the relatively strong implant abutment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.