ArticleJournal of dental sciences2022
The developing patterns of calibrated implant stability quotients of posterior implants.
Article in Journal of dental sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Implant stability in the posterior maxilla: clinical and radiographic comparison of osseodensification and conventional drilling: a randomized clinical trial.Clinical oral investigations · 2025Trial
- Development of an Angular Stiffness Sensor to Measure Dental Implant Stability In Vitro.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background/purposeMany surgical protocols were modified to improve implant stability. However, the conclusions of applying osteotome condensation technique could enhance implant stability were controversial. The evaluated implant stability quotients (ISQ) were calibrated to differentiate the implant stability improvement that applied by varied surgical techniques and the bone quality at recipient sites. Therefore, this study examine the developing patterns of calibrated ISQ values induced by osteotome bone condensation and conventional drilling technique at the posterior ridges. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe ISQ values of 4.1/4.8-mm diameter implants were calibrated by 3.3-mm diameter implants (ISQ
resultsMaxillary 14 implants and mandibular 16 implants using osteotome technique, maxillary 15 implants and mandibular 16 implants with conventional drilling technique were studied. Both techniques showed a generally similar ISQ developing pattern at both arches. Without calibration, significantly less ISQ values were noted for the osteotome technique of posterior maxilla at initial four weeks; subsequently, both techniques presented a comparable ISQ developing pattern. Osteotome technique demonstrated a greater ISQ increase after calibration on both arches (
conclusionWith calibration, osteotome condensation technique could enhance greater primary and secondary implant stability for both arches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.