Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35028006›Full record

ArticleOxidative medicine and cellular longevity2022

Establishment of a Prognostic Prediction and Drug Selection Model for Patients with Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma by Multiomics Data Analysis.

Aimin Jiang, Yewei Bao, Anbang Wang, Wenliang Gong, Xinxin Gan, Jie Wang, Yi Bao, Zhenjie Wu, Bing Liu, Juan Lu and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Identification and Verification of mFrontiers in immunology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Aimin JiangDepartment of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University (Second Military Medical University), Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9563-983X
Yewei BaoDepartment of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University (Second Military Medical University), Shanghai, China.
Anbang WangDepartment of Urology, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, (Second Military Medical University), Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0548-3182
Wenliang GongDepartment of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University (Second Military Medical University), Shanghai, China.
Xinxin GanDepartment of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University (Second Military Medical University), Shanghai, China.
Jie WangDepartment of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University (Second Military Medical University), Shanghai, China.
Yi BaoDepartment of Urology, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, (Second Military Medical University), Shanghai, China.
Zhenjie WuDepartment of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University (Second Military Medical University), Shanghai, China.
Bing LiuDepartment of Urology, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Naval Medical University (Second Military Medical University), Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4413-4492
Juan LuVocational Education Center, Naval Medical University (Second Military Medical University), Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9139-0678
Linhui WangDepartment of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University (Second Military Medical University), Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6070-1832

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

methodsThis study was based on the multiomics data (including mRNA, lncRNA, miRNA, methylation, and WES) of 258 ccRCC patients from TCGA database. Firstly, we screened the feature values that had impact on the prognosis and obtained two subtypes. Then, we used 10 algorithms to achieve multiomics clustering and conducted pseudotiming analysis to further validate the robustness of our clustering method, based on which the two subtypes of ccRCC patients were further subtyped. Meanwhile, the immune infiltration was compared between the two subtypes, and drug sensitivity and potential drugs were analyzed. Furthermore, to analyze the heterogeneity of patients at the multiomics level, biological functions between two subtypes were compared. Finally, Boruta and PCA methods were used for dimensionality reduction and cluster analysis to construct a renal cancer risk model based on mRNA expression.

resultsA prognosis predicting model of ccRCC was established by dividing patients into the high- and low-risk groups. It was found that overall survival (OS) and progression-free interval (PFI) were significantly different between the two groups (

conclusionThe model could precisely predict the prognosis of ccRCC patients and may have implications for drug selection for ccRCC patients.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Renal CellData AnalysisHumansKidney NeoplasmsPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID35028006
PMCPMC8752262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.