Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35027818›Full record

ReviewDrug design, development and therapy2022

Promising Natural Products in New Drug Design, Development, and Therapy for Skin Disorders: An Overview of Scientific Evidence and Understanding Their Mechanism of Action.

Nurul Amirah Mohd Zaid, Mahendran Sekar, Srinivasa Reddy Bonam, Siew Hua Gan, Pei Teng Lum, M Yasmin Begum, Nur Najihah Izzati Mat Rani, Jaishree Vaijanathappa, Yuan Seng Wu, Vetriselvan Subramaniyan and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Drug design, development and therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 108 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. ACS omega · 2025
    Article
  11. Veterinary world · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Biological Effects ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Nurul Amirah Mohd Zaid *Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Royal College of Medicine Perak, Universiti Kuala Lumpur, Ipoh, 30450, Malaysia.
Mahendran Sekar *Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Royal College of Medicine Perak, Universiti Kuala Lumpur, Ipoh, 30450, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-3022-6137
Srinivasa Reddy Bonam *Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale; Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Equipe-Immunopathologie et Immunointervention Thérapeutique, Sorbonne Université, Université de Paris, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-2888-2418
Siew Hua GanSchool of Pharmacy, Monash University Malaysia, Selangor Darul Ehsan, 47500, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0001-6470-3651
Pei Teng LumDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Royal College of Medicine Perak, Universiti Kuala Lumpur, Ipoh, 30450, Malaysia.
M Yasmin BegumDepartment of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, King Khalid University (KKU), Asir-Abha, 61421, Saudi Arabia.
Nur Najihah Izzati Mat RaniFaculty of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Royal College of Medicine Perak, Universiti Kuala Lumpur, Ipoh, 30450, Malaysia.
Jaishree VaijanathappaFaculty of Life Sciences, JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research Mauritius, Vacoas-Phoenix, Mauritius.
Yuan Seng WuCentre for Virus and Vaccine Research, School of Medical and Life Sciences, Sunway University, Selangor, 47500, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0001-5574-8049
Vetriselvan SubramaniyanFaculty of Medicine, Bioscience and Nursing, MAHSA University, Selangor, 42610, Malaysia.
Neeraj Kumar FuloriaFaculty of Pharmacy, AIMST University, Kedah, 08100, Malaysia.
Shivkanya FuloriaFaculty of Pharmacy, AIMST University, Kedah, 08100, Malaysia.
University of Kuala Lumpur · MYAIMST University · MYKing Khalid University · SAMahsa University · MYMauritius Institute of Education · MUMonash University Malaysia · MYSorbonne Université · FRSunway University · MY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The skin is the largest organ in the human body, composed of the epidermis and the dermis. It provides protection and acts as a barrier against external menaces like allergens, chemicals, systemic toxicity, and infectious organisms. Skin disorders like cancer, dermatitis, psoriasis, wounds, skin aging, acne, and skin infection occur frequently and can impact human life. According to a growing body of evidence, several studies have reported that natural products have the potential for treating skin disorders. Building on this information, this review provides brief information about the action of the most important in vitro and in vivo research on the use of ten selected natural products in inflammatory, neoplastic, and infectious skin disorders and their mechanisms that have been reported to date. The related studies and articles were searched from several databases, including PubMed, Google, Google Scholar, and ScienceDirect. Ten natural products that have been reported widely on skin disorders were reviewed in this study, with most showing anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, anti-microbial, and anti-cancer effects as the main therapeutic actions. Overall, most of the natural products reported in this review can reduce and suppress inflammatory markers, like tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), scavenge reactive oxygen species (ROS), induce cancer cell death through apoptosis, and prevent bacteria, fungal, and virus infections indicating their potentials. This review also highlighted the challenges and opportunities of natural products in transdermal/topical delivery systems and their safety considerations for skin disorders. Our findings indicated that natural products might be a low-cost, well-tolerated, and safe treatment for skin diseases. However, a larger number of clinical trials are required to validate these findings. Natural products in combination with modern drugs, as well as the development of novel delivery mechanisms, represent a very promising area for future drug discovery of these natural leads against skin disorders.

Indexed as

Biological ProductsDrug DesignDrug DiscoveryHumansSkin DiseasesBiological Productsanti-inflammatorydermatitisdrug deliverynatural productspsoriasisskin cancerskin disorder

Identifiers

PMID35027818
PMCPMC8749048
OpenAlexW4205971458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.