Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35027801›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine2021

Blood Cultures and Molecular Diagnostics in Intensive Care Units to Diagnose Sepsis: A Bayesian Latent Class Model Analysis.

Sriram Sampath, Jeswin Baby, Bhuvana Krishna, Nandini Dendukuri, Tinku Thomas

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sriram SampathDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7521-7106
Jeswin BabyDivision of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, St John's Research Institute, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India; Department of Statistical Sciences, Kannur University, Kannur, Kerala, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0299-3619
Bhuvana KrishnaDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, St John's Medical College and Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0003-6797
Nandini DendukuriDepartment of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2330-0976
Tinku ThomasDepartment of Biostatistics, St John's Medical College, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1786-6076
St.John's Medical College Hospital · INKannur University · INMcGill University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConfirmation of sepsis by standard blood cultures (STD) is often inconclusive due to slow growth and low positivity. Molecular diagnostics (MOL) are faster and may have higher positivity, but test performance can be inaccurately estimated if STD methods are used as comparators. Bayesian latent class models (LCMs) can evaluate diagnostic methods when there is no "gold standard." Intensive care unit studies that have used LCMs to combine and compare STD and MOL method performance and estimate the prevalence of sepsis have not been described. PATIENTS AND

methodsResults from an ICU sepsis study that used both tests simultaneously were analyzed. Bayesian LCMs combined prior prevalence of sepsis, prior diagnostic characteristics of the two methods, and the study results to estimate the posterior prevalence and diagnostic characteristics. Sensitivity analyses were performed using objective (published studies) and subjective (expert opinion) prior parameters. Positive predictive values (PPVs) of the prevalence of sepsis were estimated for all combinations of test results.

resultsThe range of posterior estimates was: sepsis prevalence (0.38-0.88), sensitivities (STD: 0.2-0.35, MOL: 0.56-0.86), and specificities (STD: 0.87-0.99, MOL: 0.72-0.95). The PPV (sepsis) of both tests being positive was (0.72-0.99).

conclusionLCMs combined two imperfect methods to estimate prevalence, PPV, and diagnostic characteristics. The posterior estimates (STD sensitivity < MOL and STD specificity > MOL) seem to reflect the clinical experience appropriately. The high PPV when both methods show positive results can be useful for ruling in disease. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Sampath S, Baby J, Krishna B, Dendukuri N, Thomas T. Blood Cultures and Molecular Diagnostics in Intensive Care Units to Diagnose Sepsis: A Bayesian Latent Class Model Analysis. Indian J Crit Care Med 2021;25(12):1402-1407.

Indexed as

Bayesian analysisBlood cultureIntensive care unitMolecular diagnosticsSepsis

Identifiers

PMID35027801
PMCPMC8693100
OpenAlexW3216117557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.