Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35027725›Full record

ArticleNature ecology & evolution2022

Site-and-branch-heterogeneous analyses of an expanded dataset favour mitochondria as sister to known Alphaproteobacteria.

Sergio A Muñoz-Gómez, Edward Susko, Kelsey Williamson, Laura Eme, Claudio H Slamovits, David Moreira, Purificación López-García, Andrew J Roger

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature ecology & evolution, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed
8.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 111 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Energetics and evolution: Response to Martin.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Bioenergetics · 2026
    Article
  9. The archaeal roots of eukaryotic life.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  10. Toward a genomic understanding of the tree of life.Molecular biology and evolution · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. ISME communications · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sergio A Muñoz-GómezEcologie Systématique Evolution, CNRS, Université Paris-Saclay, AgroParisTech, Orsay, France. sergio.munoz@universite-paris-saclay.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6200-474X
Edward SuskoDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Kelsey WilliamsonCentre for Comparative Genomics and Evolutionary Bioinformatics, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Laura EmeEcologie Systématique Evolution, CNRS, Université Paris-Saclay, AgroParisTech, Orsay, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0510-8868
Claudio H SlamovitsCentre for Comparative Genomics and Evolutionary Bioinformatics, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
David MoreiraEcologie Systématique Evolution, CNRS, Université Paris-Saclay, AgroParisTech, Orsay, France.
Purificación López-GarcíaEcologie Systématique Evolution, CNRS, Université Paris-Saclay, AgroParisTech, Orsay, France.
Andrew J RogerCentre for Comparative Genomics and Evolutionary Bioinformatics, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada. andrew.roger@dal.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1370-9820
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRDalhousie University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Determining the phylogenetic origin of mitochondria is key to understanding the ancestral mitochondrial symbiosis and its role in eukaryogenesis. However, the precise evolutionary relationship between mitochondria and their closest bacterial relatives remains hotly debated. The reasons include pervasive phylogenetic artefacts as well as limited protein and taxon sampling. Here we developed a new model of protein evolution that accommodates both across-site and across-branch compositional heterogeneity. We applied this site-and-branch-heterogeneous model (MAM60 + GFmix) to a considerably expanded dataset that comprises 108 mitochondrial proteins of alphaproteobacterial origin, and novel metagenome-assembled genomes from microbial mats, microbialites and sediments. The MAM60 + GFmix model fits the data much better and agrees with analyses of compositionally homogenized datasets with conventional site-heterogenous models. The consilience of evidence thus suggests that mitochondria are sister to the Alphaproteobacteria to the exclusion of MarineProteo1 and Magnetococcia. We also show that the ancestral presence of the crista-developing mitochondrial contact site and cristae organizing system (a mitofilin-domain-containing Mic60 protein) in mitochondria and the Alphaproteobacteria only supports their close relationship.

Indexed as

AlphaproteobacteriaMetagenomeMitochondriaMitochondrial ProteinsPhylogenyMitochondrial Proteins

Identifiers

PMID35027725
OpenAlexW4206320337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.