Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35027677›Full record

ArticleNature microbiology2022

Unique mobile elements and scalable gene flow at the prokaryote-eukaryote boundary revealed by circularized Asgard archaea genomes.

Fabai Wu, Daan R Speth, Alon Philosof, Antoine Crémière, Aditi Narayanan, Roman A Barco, Stephanie A Connon, Jan P Amend, Igor A Antoshechkin, Victoria J Orphan

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The archaeal roots of eukaryotic life.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Chromatin and gene regulation in archaea.Molecular microbiology · 2025
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Fabai WuDivision of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA. wu.fa.bai@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5812-5621
Daan R SpethDivision of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA.
Alon PhilosofDivision of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2684-8678
Antoine CrémièreDivision of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7382-2097
Aditi NarayananDivision of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA.
Roman A BarcoDepartment of Earth Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Stephanie A ConnonDivision of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA.
Jan P AmendDepartment of Earth Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4953-7776
Igor A AntoshechkinDivision of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA.
Victoria J OrphanDivision of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA. vorphan@gps.caltech.edu.
California Institute of Technology · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eukaryotic genomes are known to have garnered innovations from both archaeal and bacterial domains but the sequence of events that led to the complex gene repertoire of eukaryotes is largely unresolved. Here, through the enrichment of hydrothermal vent microorganisms, we recovered two circularized genomes of Heimdallarchaeum species that belong to an Asgard archaea clade phylogenetically closest to eukaryotes. These genomes reveal diverse mobile elements, including an integrative viral genome that bidirectionally replicates in a circular form and aloposons, transposons that encode the 5,000 amino acid-sized proteins Otus and Ephialtes. Heimdallaechaeal mobile elements have garnered various genes from bacteria and bacteriophages, likely playing a role in shuffling functions across domains. The number of archaea- and bacteria-related genes follow strikingly different scaling laws in Asgard archaea, exhibiting a genome size-dependent ratio and a functional division resembling the bacteria- and archaea-derived gene repertoire across eukaryotes. Bacterial gene import has thus likely been a continuous process unaltered by eukaryogenesis and scaled up through genome expansion. Our data further highlight the importance of viewing eukaryogenesis in a pan-Asgard context, which led to the proposal of a conceptual framework, that is, the Heimdall nucleation-decentralized innovation-hierarchical import model that accounts for the emergence of eukaryotic complexity.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGene FlowGenome, ArchaealArchaeaArchaeal ProteinsBacteriaEukaryotaMetagenomicsPhylogenyProkaryotic CellsArchaeal Proteins

Identifiers

PMID35027677
PMCPMC8813620
OpenAlexW4205889370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.