Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35027672›Full record

ReviewBritish journal of cancer2022

Cell-free DNA analysis in current cancer clinical trials: a review.

M Cisneros-Villanueva, L Hidalgo-Pérez, M Rios-Romero, A Cedro-Tanda, C A Ruiz-Villavicencio, K Page, R Hastings, D Fernandez-Garcia, R Allsopp, M A Fonseca-Montaño and 4 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British journal of cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06105177 (Implementation of Up-front ctDNA Analysis Into Lung Cancer Care and Development of Liquid Biopsy-based Decision Support Models - the Lungmarker² Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 116 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
116citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
17.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06105177 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Implementation of Up-front ctDNA Analysis Into Lung Cancer Care and Development of Liquid Biopsy-based Decision Support Models - the Lungmarker² Study

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorCatharina Ziekenhuis EindhovenRan2023 to 2026Enrolled800ConditionsLung Cancer
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

116 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 192 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Rethinking the microenvironment's role in chemical-induced malignancy.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2026
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

56 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

M Cisneros-VillanuevaLaboratorio de Genómica del Cáncer, Instituto Nacional de Medicina Genómica, Mexico, Periférico Sur No. 4809, Col. Arenal Tepepan, Delegación Tlalpan, Ciudad de Mexico, 14610, Mexico City, Mexico.
L Hidalgo-PérezLaboratorio de Genómica del Cáncer, Instituto Nacional de Medicina Genómica, Mexico, Periférico Sur No. 4809, Col. Arenal Tepepan, Delegación Tlalpan, Ciudad de Mexico, 14610, Mexico City, Mexico.
M Rios-RomeroLaboratorio de Genómica del Cáncer, Instituto Nacional de Medicina Genómica, Mexico, Periférico Sur No. 4809, Col. Arenal Tepepan, Delegación Tlalpan, Ciudad de Mexico, 14610, Mexico City, Mexico.
A Cedro-TandaLaboratorio de Genómica del Cáncer, Instituto Nacional de Medicina Genómica, Mexico, Periférico Sur No. 4809, Col. Arenal Tepepan, Delegación Tlalpan, Ciudad de Mexico, 14610, Mexico City, Mexico.
C A Ruiz-VillavicencioLaboratorio de Genómica del Cáncer, Instituto Nacional de Medicina Genómica, Mexico, Periférico Sur No. 4809, Col. Arenal Tepepan, Delegación Tlalpan, Ciudad de Mexico, 14610, Mexico City, Mexico.
K PageLeicester Cancer Research Centre, Department of Genetics and Genome Biology, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK.
R HastingsLeicester Cancer Research Centre, Department of Genetics and Genome Biology, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK.
D Fernandez-GarciaLeicester Cancer Research Centre, Department of Genetics and Genome Biology, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK.
R AllsoppLeicester Cancer Research Centre, Department of Genetics and Genome Biology, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK.
M A Fonseca-MontañoLaboratorio de Genómica del Cáncer, Instituto Nacional de Medicina Genómica, Mexico, Periférico Sur No. 4809, Col. Arenal Tepepan, Delegación Tlalpan, Ciudad de Mexico, 14610, Mexico City, Mexico.
S Jimenez-MoralesLaboratorio de Genómica del Cáncer, Instituto Nacional de Medicina Genómica, Mexico, Periférico Sur No. 4809, Col. Arenal Tepepan, Delegación Tlalpan, Ciudad de Mexico, 14610, Mexico City, Mexico.
V Padilla-PalmaLaboratorio de Genómica del Cáncer, Instituto Nacional de Medicina Genómica, Mexico, Periférico Sur No. 4809, Col. Arenal Tepepan, Delegación Tlalpan, Ciudad de Mexico, 14610, Mexico City, Mexico.
J A ShawLeicester Cancer Research Centre, Department of Genetics and Genome Biology, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK. js39@leicester.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4227-503X
A Hidalgo-MirandaLaboratorio de Genómica del Cáncer, Instituto Nacional de Medicina Genómica, Mexico, Periférico Sur No. 4809, Col. Arenal Tepepan, Delegación Tlalpan, Ciudad de Mexico, 14610, Mexico City, Mexico. ahidalgo@inmegen.gob.mx.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2315-3977
National Institute of Genomic Medicine · MXUniversity of Leicester · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 23464
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) analysis represents a promising method for the diagnosis, treatment selection and clinical follow-up of cancer patients. Although its general methodological feasibility and usefulness has been demonstrated, several issues related to standardisation and technical validation must be addressed for its routine clinical application in cancer. In this regard, most cfDNA clinical applications are still limited to clinical trials, proving its value in several settings. In this paper, we review the current clinical trials involving cfDNA/ctDNA analysis and highlight those where it has been useful for patient stratification, treatment follow-up or development of novel approaches for early diagnosis. Our query included clinical trials, including the terms 'cfDNA', 'ctDNA', 'liquid biopsy' AND 'cancer OR neoplasm' in the FDA and EMA public databases. We identified 1370 clinical trials (FDA = 1129, EMA = 241) involving liquid-biopsy analysis in cancer. These clinical trials show promising results for the early detection of cancer and confirm cfDNA as a tool for real-time monitoring of acquired therapy resistance, accurate disease-progression surveillance and improvement of treatment, situations that result in a better quality of life and extended overall survival for cancer patients.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiomarkers, TumorCell-Free Nucleic AcidsClinical Trials as TopicEarly Detection of CancerHumansNeoplasmsNeoplastic Cells, CirculatingPrecision MedicineBiomarkers, TumorCell-Free Nucleic Acids

Identifiers

PMID35027672
PMCPMC8810765
OpenAlexW4205616172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.