Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35027434›Full record

ArticleCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology2022

Clinical Utility of Reflex Testing with Cancer Biomarkers to Improve Diagnostic Accuracy of Primary Human Papillomavirus Screening.

Lauren G Johnson, Rakiya Saidu, Cecilia Svanholm-Barrie, Rosalind Boa, Jennifer Moodley, Ana Tergas, David Persing, Scott A Campbell, Wei-Yann Tsai, Thomas C Wright and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Lauren G JohnsonGertrude H. Sergievsky Center, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York.
Rakiya SaiduDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-4959-8157
Cecilia Svanholm-BarrieCepheid, Solna, Sweden.
Rosalind BoaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Jennifer MoodleySouth African Medical Research Council Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre (SAMRC GCRC), University of Cape Town, South Africa.
Ana TergasDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York.
David PersingCepheid, Sunnyvale, California.
Scott A CampbellCepheid, Sunnyvale, California.ORCID 0000-0003-2528-4997
Wei-Yann TsaiDepartment of Biostatistics, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York.
Thomas C WrightDepartment of Pathology, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York.
Lynette DennyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-7123-1373
Louise KuhnGertrude H. Sergievsky Center, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-2305-8665
Columbia University Irving Medical Center · USSouth African Medical Research Council · ZA3D Technology Laboratories (United States) · USPublic Health Agency of Sweden · SEUniversity of Cape Town · ZA

Funding

Automated Digital Imaging for Cervical Cancer ScreeningR01CA254576 · NCI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI KUHN, LOUISE · 2020 to 2024
$2.6M
Improving specificity of HPV Screen-and-Treat in South AfricaUH3CA189908 · NCI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI KUHN, LOUISE · 2016 to 2018
$2.5M
Automated Visual Evaluation for Cervical Cancer Screening in HIV-positive WomenR01CA250011 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN · PI KUHN, LOUISE, MBATANI, NOMONDE HAZEL · 2020 to 2024
$1.7M
Training Program in Cancer-related Population SciencesT32CA094061 · NCI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI NEUGUT, ALFRED I., TERRY, MARY BETH · 2017 to 2021
$1.1M
Improving specificity of HPV Screen-and-Treat in South AfricaUH2CA189908 · NCI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI KUHN, LOUISE · 2014 to 2015
$998k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA250011NCI NIH HHS R01 CA254576NCI NIH HHS T32 CA094061NCI NIH HHS UH2 CA189908NCI NIH HHS UH3 CA189908
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHuman papillomavirus (HPV) testing is the cornerstone of cervical cancer screening, with outstanding sensitivity but only moderate specificity. We evaluated whether reflex testing for cancer biomarkers improves the sensitivity/specificity balance of screening.

methodsCervical samples from women in Cape Town, South Africa, ages 30-65 years, were collected and tested with Xpert HPV and with real-time PCR to detect mRNA for cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A (CDKN2A), topoisomerase 2 alpha (TOP2A), and Ki67 (MKi67). Women with histologically confirmed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2+; 85 women without and 166 with HIV) and women with no cervical disease (331 without and 257 with HIV) were included.

resultsWhen used as reflex tests after a positive HPV result, biomarkers discriminated well between women with and without CIN2+. The inclusion of both CDKN2A and MKi67 had the best performance, with area under the curve (AUC) of 0.9171 and 0.8734 in women without and with HIV, respectively. Although excellent, these performance parameters did not improve on an approach utilizing only HPV testing with more stringent cycle threshold cutoffs and HPV genotype selection, which achieved AUC of 0.9059 and 0.8705 in women without and with HIV, respectively.

conclusionsBiomarkers can be used as triage after positive HPV results but do not outperform an approach utilizing higher viral load cutoffs on selected high-risk genotypes. IMPACT: A screening approach using HPV testing alone can be more easily implemented at the point of care.

Indexed as

AlphapapillomavirusHIV InfectionsPapillomavirus InfectionsUterine Cervical DysplasiaUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPapillomaviridaeReflexSensitivity and SpecificityBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID35027434
PMCPMC8901524
OpenAlexW4205253457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.