Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35027347›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2022

Clinical Feasibility of Ultrafast Contrast-Enhanced T1-Weighted 3D-EPI for Evaluating Intracranial Enhancing Lesions in Oncology Patients: Comparison with Standard 3D MPRAGE Sequence.

K H Ryu, H J Baek, S Skare, E Cho, I C Nam, T H Kim, T Sprenger

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

K H RyuFrom the Departments of Radiology (K.H.R., H.J.B., E.C., I.C.N.).ORCID 0000-0003-1599-8881
H J BaekFrom the Departments of Radiology (K.H.R., H.J.B., E.C., I.C.N.) sartre81@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-7349-2841
S SkareDepartment of Neuroradiology (S.S.).ORCID 0000-0001-5403-2153
E ChoFrom the Departments of Radiology (K.H.R., H.J.B., E.C., I.C.N.).ORCID 0000-0001-7814-7430
I C NamFrom the Departments of Radiology (K.H.R., H.J.B., E.C., I.C.N.).ORCID 0000-0001-8406-6645
T H KimInternal Medicine (T.H.K.), Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine and Gyeongsang National University Changwon Hospital, Changwon, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-3438-006X
T SprengerClinical Neuroscience (S.S., T.S.), Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-7037-8605
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission · USChangwon National University · KRGeneral Electric (Spain) · ESKarolinska Institutet · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeContrast-enhanced 3D T1WI is a preferred sequence for brain tumor imaging despite the long scan time. This study investigated the clinical feasibility of ultrafast contrast-enhanced T1WI by 3D echo-planar imaging compared with a standard contrast-enhanced 3D MPRAGE sequence for evaluating intracranial enhancing lesions in oncology patients. MATERIALS AND

methodsSixty-one patients in oncology underwent brain MR imaging including both contrast-enhanced T1WI, 3D-EPI and 3D MPRAGE, in a single examination session for evaluating intracranial tumors. Two neuroradiologists evaluated image quality, lesion conspicuity, diagnostic confidence, number and size of the lesions, and contrast-to-noise ratio measurements from the 2 different sequences.

resultsUltrafast 3D-EPI T1WI did not reveal significant differences in diagnostic confidence, contrast-to-noise ratio

conclusionsUltrafast 3D-EPI T1WI showed comparable diagnostic performance with sufficient image quality and a 7-fold reduction in scan time for evaluating intracranial enhancing lesions compared with standard MPRAGE, even though it was limited by an inferior image quality and frequent susceptibility artifacts. Therefore, we believe that ultrafast 3D-EPI T1WI may be a viable option in oncology patients prone to movement during imaging studies.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsEcho-Planar ImagingFeasibility StudiesHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMagnetic Resonance Imaging

Identifiers

PMID35027347
PMCPMC8985684
OpenAlexW4206484768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.