Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35027034›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2022

Daily uplifts during the COVID-19 pandemic: what is considered helpful in everyday life?

Rakel Eklund, Kristina Bondjers, Ida Hensler, Maria Bragesjö, Kerstin Bergh Johannesson, Filip K Arnberg, Josefin Sveen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Rakel EklundNational Centre for Disaster Psychiatry, Department of Neuroscience, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. rakel.eklund@neuro.uu.se.
Kristina BondjersNational Centre for Disaster Psychiatry, Department of Neuroscience, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Ida HenslerNational Centre for Disaster Psychiatry, Department of Neuroscience, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Maria BragesjöDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Division of Psychology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Kerstin Bergh JohannessonNational Centre for Disaster Psychiatry, Department of Neuroscience, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Filip K ArnbergNational Centre for Disaster Psychiatry, Department of Neuroscience, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Josefin SveenNational Centre for Disaster Psychiatry, Department of Neuroscience, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Uppsala University · SECentre of Natural Hazards and Disaster Science · SEKarolinska Institutet · SE

Funding

Akademiska Sjukhuset ALF-942431the Swedish Board of Health and Welfare 10.1-37970/2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundKnowledge of what is uplifting and helpful during pandemics could inform the design of sustainable pandemic recommendations in the future. We have explored individuals' views on helpful and uplifting aspects of everyday life during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.

methodsParticipants answered a brief, daily survey via text messages during 14 consecutive days in July-August, 2020. The survey included the question: "During the past 24 hours, is there anything that has made you feel good or helped you in your life?" We used content analysis to compile responses from 693 participants, who provided 4,490 free-text answers, which resulted in 24 categories subsumed under 7 themes.

resultsPositive aspects during the COVID-19 pandemic primarily related to social interactions, in real life or digitally, with family, friends and others. Other important aspects concerning work, colleagues and maintaining everyday life routines. One theme concerning vacations, going on excursions and being in nature. Leisure and recreation activities, such as hobbies and physical exercise, also emerged as important, as did health-related factors. Bodily sensations, thoughts, feelings and activities that benefited well-being were mentioned frequently. Lastly, people commented on the government strategies for containing COVID-19, and whether to comply with restrictions.

conclusionsTo summarize, daily uplifts and helpful aspects of everyday life centered around social relationships. To comply with recommendations on physical distancing, people found creative ways to maintain social connections both digitally and face-to-face. Social interaction, maintenance of everyday life routines, hobbies and physical activity appeared to be important for well-being.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsGovernmentHumansSARS-CoV-2Surveys and QuestionnairesCOVID-19Daily upliftsEveryday lifePandemic

Identifiers

PMID35027034
PMCPMC8757393
OpenAlexW4206765907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.