Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35027000›Full record

Trial reportBMC infectious diseases2022

Did you hear about HIV self-testing? HIV self-testing awareness after community-based HIVST distribution in rural Zimbabwe.

Anke Rotsaert, Euphemia Sibanda, Karin Hatzold, Cheryl Johnson, Elizabeth Corbett, Melissa Neuman, Frances Cowan

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC infectious diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Anke RotsaertDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nationalestraat 155, 2000, Antwerp, Belgium. arotsaert@itg.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5895-9332
Euphemia SibandaCentre for Sexual Health and HIV AIDS Research (CeSHHAR), Harare, Zimbabwe.
Karin HatzoldPopulation Services International, Cape Town, South Africa.
Cheryl JohnsonGlobal HIV, Hepatitis and STI Programmes, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Elizabeth CorbettDepartment of Clinical Research and Infection Disease, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Melissa NeumanFaculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Frances CowanCentre for Sexual Health and HIV AIDS Research (CeSHHAR), Harare, Zimbabwe.
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine · GBInstituut voor Tropische Geneeskunde · BE

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/R010161/1Medical Research Council MR/S005307/1UNITAID PO# 10140-0-600UNITAID PO# 8477-0-600Wellcome Trust 200901/Z/16/ZWorld Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeveral trials of community-based HIV self-testing (HIVST) provide evidence on the acceptability and feasibility of campaign-style distribution to reach first-time testers, men and adolescents. However, we do not know how many remain unaware of HIVST after distribution campaigns, and who these individuals are. Here we look at factors associated with never having heard of HIVST after community-based campaign-style HIVST distribution in rural Zimbabwe between September 2016 and July 2017.

methodsAnalysis of representative population-based trial survey data collected from 7146 individuals following community-based HIVST distribution to households was conducted. Factors associated with having never heard of HIVST were determined using multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression adjusted for clustered design.

resultsAmong survey participants, 1308 (18.3%) self-reported having never heard of HIVST. Individuals who were between 20 and 60 years old {20-29 years: [aOR = 0.74, 95% CI (0.58-0.95)], 30-39 years: [aOR = 0.56, 95% CI (0.42-0.74)], 40-49 years: [aOR = 0.50, 95% CI (0.36-0.68)], 50-59 years [aOR = 0.58, 95% CI (0.42-0.82)]}, who had attained at least ordinary level education [aOR = 0.51, 95% CI (0.34-0.76)], and who had an HIV test before [aOR = 0.30, 95% CI (0.25-0.37)] were less likely to have never heard of HIVST compared with individuals who were between 16 and 19 years old, who had a lower educational level and who had never tested for HIV before, respectively. In addition, non-household heads or household head representatives [aOR = 1.21, 95% CI (1.01-1.45)] were more likely to report never having heard of HIVST compared to household head and representatives.

conclusionsAround one fifth of survey participants remain unaware of HIVST even after an intensive community-based door-to-door HIVST distribution. Of note, those least likely to have heard of self-testing were younger, less educated and less likely to have tested previously. Household heads appear to play an important role in granting or denying access to self-testing to other household members during door-to-door distribution. Differentiated distribution models are needed to ensure access to all. Trial registration PACTR, PACTR201607001701788. Registered 29 June 2016, https://pactr.samrc.ac.za/ PACTR201607001701788.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsSelf-TestingAdolescentAdultHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultZimbabweCommunity-based distributionHIV self-testing

Identifiers

PMID35027000
PMCPMC8895763
OpenAlexW4205589159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.