Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35026129›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of obstetrics and gynecology2022

Clinical Opinion: The diagnosis and management of suspected fetal growth restriction: an evidence-based approach.

Christoph C Lees, Roberto Romero, Tamara Stampalija, Andrea Dall'Asta, Greggory A DeVore, Federico Prefumo, Tiziana Frusca, Gerard H A Visser, John C Hobbins, Ahmet A Baschat and 17 more

Retracted Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. It is linked to trial NCT06919692 (Impact of Maternal Left-Lateral Recumbent Positioning in Pregnancies With Fetal Growth Restriction), which is not on this map. Cited by 93 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
93citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
31.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06919692 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Impact of Maternal Left-Lateral Recumbent Positioning in Pregnancies With Fetal Growth Restriction

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Colorado, DenverRan2025 to 2026Enrolled100ConditionsFetal Growth RestrictionArmsLeft lateral recumbent positioning
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

93 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 186 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Modified umbilical artery Doppler scoring system based on multisite assessment: association with perinatal outcome in early and late fetal growth restriction.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Extent of Absent End Diastolic Flow in Umbilical Artery Doppler and Its Prediction of Adverse Perinatal Outcome-A Prospective Observational Study.Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine · 2026
    Observational
  10. Awaiting results of the TRUFFLE-2 randomized controlled trial: what are the expectations among investigators?Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2026
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Placental insufficiency markers to assess the risk of non-chromosomal genetic conditions in early-onset fetal growth restriction.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2026
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

33 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Reinstatement · 2022-01-10Date of Article and/or Notice Unknown · Notice - Limited or No Information · Retract and Replace · Temporary Removal · Removed · · article retracted and reinstated unknonw date/reasons, html page overwrite (1/29/22 AJA);
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors at 20 institutions in 12 countries.

Christoph C LeesDepartment of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Institute of Reproductive and Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom. Electronic address: c.lees@imperial.ac.uk.
Roberto RomeroPerinatology Research Branch, Division of Obstetrics and Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Division of Intramural Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, US Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, MD, and Detroit, MI; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI; Center for Molecular Medicine and Genetics, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI.
Tamara StampalijaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Unit of Fetal Medicine and Prenatal Diagnosis, Institute for Maternal and Child Health, Scientific Institute for Research, Hospitalization and Healthcare Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy; Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
Andrea Dall'AstaDepartment of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Institute of Reproductive and Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom; Department of Medicine and Surgery, Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Greggory A DeVoreDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.
Federico PrefumoDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Tiziana FruscaDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Gerard H A VisserDepartment of Obstetrics, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
John C HobbinsDivision of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO.
Ahmet A BaschatDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, John Hopkins Center for Fetal Therapy, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.
Caterina M BilardoAmsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Henry L GalanDivision of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO; Colorado Fetal Care Center, Children's Hospital of Colorado, Aurora, CO.
Stuart CampbellCreate Fertility, London, United Kingdom.
Dev MaulikDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, MO.
Francesc FiguerasBCNatal, Barcelona Center for Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, Hospital Clínic and Hospital Sant Joan de Déu, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Wesley LeeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor College of Medicine and Texas Children's Pavilion for Women, Houston, TX.
Julia UnterscheiderDepartment of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Melbourne, Australia.
Herbert ValensiseUniversity of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy; Department of Surgery, Policlinico Casilino, Rome, Italy.
Fabricio Da Silva CostaMaternal-Fetal Medicine Unit, Gold Coast University Hospital, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia; School of Medicine, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.
Laurent J SalomonObstétrique et Plateforme LUMIERE, Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades (AP-HP) et Université de Paris, Paris, France.
Liona C PoonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region of China.
Enrico FerrazziDepartment of Woman, Child and Neonate, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Giancarlo MariDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH.
Giuseppe RizzoUniversità di Roma Tor Vergata, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fondazione Policinico Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy; The First I.M. Sechenov Moscow State Medical University, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Moscow, Russian Federation.
John C KingdomPlacenta Program, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Torvid KiserudDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Haukeland University Hospital, and Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Kurt HecherDepartment of Obstetrics and Fetal Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
University of Parma · ITUniversity of Rome Tor Vergata · ITAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLBaylor College of Medicine · USChildren's Hospital Colorado · USChinese University of Hong Kong · HKCleveland Clinic · USFondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico · ITGriffith University · AUHaukeland University Hospital · NOHôpital Necker-Enfants Malades · FRHospital Sant Joan de Déu Barcelona · ESImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust · GBJohns Hopkins University · USMount Sinai Hospital · CANational Institutes of Health · USRoyal Women's Hospital · AUUniversität Hamburg · DEUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLUniversity of Brescia · IT

Funding

THE ROLE OF SUBCLINICAL INFECTION AND CYTOKINES IN PRETERM PARTURITIONZ01HD002401 · NICHD · EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT · PI ROMERO, ROBERTO · 1993 to 2008
$3.7M
Department of HealthIntramural NIH HHS Z01 HD002401
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study reviewed the literature about the diagnosis, antepartum surveillance, and time of delivery of fetuses suspected to be small for gestational age or growth restricted. Several guidelines have been issued by major professional organizations, including the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. The differences in recommendations, in particular about Doppler velocimetry of the ductus venosus and middle cerebral artery, have created confusion among clinicians, and this review has intended to clarify and highlight the available evidence that is pertinent to clinical management. A fetus who is small for gestational age is frequently defined as one with an estimated fetal weight of <10th percentile. This condition has been considered syndromic and has been frequently attributed to fetal growth restriction, a constitutionally small fetus, congenital infections, chromosomal abnormalities, or genetic conditions. Small for gestational age is not synonymous with fetal growth restriction, which is defined by deceleration of fetal growth determined by a change in fetal growth velocity. An abnormal umbilical artery Doppler pulsatility index reflects an increased impedance to flow in the umbilical circulation and is considered to be an indicator of placental disease. The combined finding of an estimated fetal weight of <10th percentile and abnormal umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry has been widely accepted as indicative of fetal growth restriction. Clinical studies have shown that the gestational age at diagnosis can be used to subclassify suspected fetal growth restriction into early and late, depending on whether the condition is diagnosed before or after 32 weeks of gestation. The early type is associated with umbilical artery Doppler abnormalities, whereas the late type is often associated with a low pulsatility index in the middle cerebral artery. A large randomized clinical trial indicated that in the context of early suspected fetal growth restriction, the combination of computerized cardiotocography and fetal ductus venosus Doppler improves outcomes, such that 95% of surviving infants have a normal neurodevelopmental outcome at 2 years of age. A low middle cerebral artery pulsatility index is associated with an adverse perinatal outcome in late fetal growth restriction; however, there is no evidence supporting its use to determine the time of delivery. Nonetheless, an abnormality in middle cerebral artery Doppler could be valuable to increase the surveillance of the fetus at risk. We propose that fetal size, growth rate, uteroplacental Doppler indices, cardiotocography, and maternal conditions (ie, hypertension) according to gestational age are important factors in optimizing the outcome of suspected fetal growth restriction.

Indexed as

Fetal Growth RetardationFetal WeightFemaleGestational AgeHumansInfantPlacentaPregnancyRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicUltrasonography, DopplerUltrasonography, PrenatalUmbilical Arteriesabdominal circumferencecardiotocographycesarean deliveryDisproportionate Intrauterine Growth Intervention Trial at TermDoppler velocimetryductus venosusfetal biometryfetal deathfetal distressfetal growthlongitudinalmiddle cerebral arteryneurodevelopmental outcomeProspective Observational Trial to Optimize Pediatric Healthrandomized controlled trialshort-term variationsmall for gestational agesystematic reviewTrial of Umbilical and Fetal Flow in Europeumbilical artery Dopplerumbilical artery pHuterine artery

Identifiers

PMID35026129
PMCPMC9125563
OpenAlexW4205599139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.