Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35025916›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Phytoremediation of nickel by quinoa: Morphological and physiological response.

Muhammad Haseeb, Shahid Iqbal, Muhammad Bilal Hafeez, Muhammad Sohail Saddiq, Noreen Zahra, Ali Raza, Muhammad Usman Lbrahim, Javaid Iqbal, Muhammad Kamran, Qasim Ali and 3 more

RetractedAbstract readRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Muhammad HaseebDepartment of Agronomy, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Shahid IqbalDepartment of Agronomy, Muhammad Nawaz Shareef, University of Agriculture, Multan, Pakistan.
Muhammad Bilal HafeezDepartment of Agronomy, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Muhammad Sohail SaddiqDepartment of Agronomy, Ghazi University, Dera Ghazi Khan, Pakistan.
Noreen ZahraDepartment of Botany, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Ali RazaFujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Crop Molecular and Cell Biology, Oil Crops Research Institute, Centre of Legume Crop Genetics and Systems Biology/College of Agriculture, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5120-2791
Muhammad Usman LbrahimDepartment of Agronomy, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Javaid IqbalDepartment of Agronomy, Ghazi University, Dera Ghazi Khan, Pakistan.
Muhammad KamranDepartment of Agronomy, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Qasim AliInstitute of Food and Agriculture Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States of America.
Talha JavedCollege of Agriculture, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2986-9992
Hayssam M AliDepartment of Botany and Microbiology, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Manzer H SiddiquiDepartment of Botany and Microbiology, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The amount of soil contaminated with heavy metal increases due to urbanization, industrialization, and anthropogenic activities. Quinoa is considered a useful candidate in the remediation of such soil. In this pot experiment, the phytoextraction capacity of quinoa lines (A1, A2, A7, and A9) against different nickel (Ni) concentrations (0, 50, and 100 mg kg-1) were investigated. Required Ni concentrations were developed in polythene bags filled with sandy loam soil using nickel nitrate salt prior to two months of sowing and kept sealed up to sowing. Results showed that translocation of Ni increased from roots to shoots with an increase in soil Ni concentration in all lines. A2 line accumulated high Ni in leaf compared to the root as depicted by translocation factor 3.09 and 3.21 when grown at soil having 50 and 100 Ni mg kg-1, respectively. While, in the case of root, A7 accumulated high Ni followed by A9, A1, and A2, respectively. There was a 5-7% increased seed yield by 50 mg kg-1 Ni in all except A1 compared to control. However, growth and yield declined with a further increase in Ni level. The maximum reduction in yield was noticed in A9, which was strongly linked with poor physiological performance, e.g., chlorophyll a, b, and phenolic contents. Ni concentrations in the seed of all lines were within the permissible value set (67 ppm) by FAO/WHO. The result of the present study suggests that quinoa is a better accumulator of Ni. This species can provide the scope of decontamination of heavy metal polluted soil. The screened line can be used for future quinoa breeding programs for bioremediation and phytoextraction purpose.

Indexed as

Biodegradation, EnvironmentalCadmiumChenopodium quinoaEnvironmental Restoration and RemediationMetals, HeavyNickelSoilSoil PollutantsCadmiumMetals, HeavyNickelSoilSoil Pollutants

Identifiers

PMID35025916
PMCPMC8757961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.