Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35025915›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Loneliness among people with severe mental illness during the COVID-19 pandemic: Results from a linked UK population cohort study.

Paul Heron, Panagiotis Spanakis, Suzanne Crosland, Gordon Johnston, Elizabeth Newbronner, Ruth Wadman, Lauren Walker, Simon Gilbody, Emily Peckham

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Predictors of Loneliness among Homeless Individuals in Germany during the COVID-19 Pandemic.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Paul HeronMental Health and Addiction Research Group, University of York, York, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3529-5737
Panagiotis SpanakisMental Health and Addiction Research Group, University of York, York, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2732-8300
Suzanne CroslandMental Health and Addiction Research Group, University of York, York, United Kingdom.
Gordon JohnstonIndependent Peer Researcher, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4483-8932
Elizabeth NewbronnerMental Health and Addiction Research Group, University of York, York, United Kingdom.
Ruth WadmanMental Health and Addiction Research Group, University of York, York, United Kingdom.
Lauren WalkerMental Health and Addiction Research Group, University of York, York, United Kingdom.
Simon GilbodyMental Health and Addiction Research Group, University of York, York, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8236-6983
Emily PeckhamMental Health and Addiction Research Group, University of York, York, United Kingdom.
University of York · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/V028529Medical Research Council MR/V028529/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 204829
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aim/goal/purposePopulation surveys underrepresent people with severe mental ill health. This paper aims to use multiple regression analyses to explore perceived social support, loneliness and factor associations from self-report survey data collected during the Covid-19 pandemic in a sample of individuals with severe mental ill health. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: We sampled an already existing cohort of people with severe mental ill health. Researchers contacted participants by phone or by post to invite them to take part in a survey about how the pandemic restrictions had impacted health, Covid-19 experiences, perceived social support, employment and loneliness. Loneliness was measured by the three item UCLA loneliness scale.

findingsIn the pandemic sub-cohort, 367 adults with a severe mental ill health diagnosis completed a remote survey. 29-34% of participants reported being lonely. Loneliness was associated with being younger in age (adjusted OR = -.98, p = .02), living alone (adjusted OR = 2.04, p = .01), high levels of social and economic deprivation (adjusted OR = 2.49, p = .04), and lower perceived social support (B = -5.86, p < .001). Living alone was associated with lower perceived social support. Being lonely was associated with a self-reported deterioration in mental health during the pandemic (adjusted OR = 3.46, 95%CI 2.03-5.91). PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Intervention strategies to tackle loneliness in the severe mental ill health population are needed. Further research is needed to follow-up the severe mental ill health population after pandemic restrictions are lifted to understand perceived social support and loneliness trends. ORIGINALITY: Loneliness was a substantial problem for the severe mental ill health population before the Covid-19 pandemic but there is limited evidence to understand perceived social support and loneliness trends during the pandemic.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesCOVID-19DepressionFemaleHome EnvironmentHumansLonelinessMaleMental DisordersMental HealthMiddle AgedPandemicsSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID35025915
PMCPMC8757957
OpenAlexW4205515522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.