Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35025906›Full record

ArticlePloS one

Factors influencing environmental sampling recovery of healthcare pathogens from non-porous surfaces with cellulose sponges.

Laura J Rose, Hollis Houston, Marla Martinez-Smith, Amanda K Lyons, Carrie Whitworth, Sujan C Reddy, Judith Noble-Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Laura J RoseDivision of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1428-6594
Hollis HoustonDivision of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Marla Martinez-SmithDivision of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Amanda K LyonsDivision of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4312-2481
Carrie WhitworthDivision of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Sujan C ReddyDivision of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Judith Noble-WangDivision of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5090-5025
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Results from sampling healthcare surfaces for pathogens are difficult to interpret without understanding the factors that influence pathogen detection. We investigated the recovery of four healthcare-associated pathogens from three common surface materials, and how a body fluid simulant (artificial test soil, ATS), deposition method, and contamination levels influence the percent of organisms recovered (%R). Known quantities of carbapenemase-producing KPC+ Klebsiella pneumoniae (KPC), Acinetobacter baumannii, vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis, and Clostridioides difficile spores (CD) were suspended in Butterfield's buffer or ATS, deposited on 323cm2 steel, plastic, and laminate surfaces, allowed to dry 1h, then sampled with a cellulose sponge wipe. Bacteria were eluted, cultured, CFU counted and %R determined relative to the inoculum. The %R varied by organism, from <1% (KPC) to almost 60% (CD) and was more dependent upon the organism's characteristics and presence of ATS than on surface type. KPC persistence as determined by culture also declined by >1 log10 within the 60 min drying time. For all organisms, the %R was significantly greater if suspended in ATS than if suspended in Butterfield's buffer (p<0.05), and for most organisms the %R was not significantly different when sampled from any of the three surfaces. Organisms deposited in multiple droplets were recovered at equal or higher %R than if spread evenly on the surface. This work assists in interpreting data collected while investigating a healthcare infection outbreak or while conducting infection intervention studies.

Indexed as

Acinetobacter baumanniiBacteriaBandagesCelluloseClostridioides difficileHumansKlebsiella pneumoniaePlasticsSpecimen HandlingSteelSurface PropertiesVancomycin-Resistant EnterococciCellulosePlasticsSteel

Identifiers

PMID35025906
PMCPMC8757884
OpenAlexW4206049550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.